Proving the Mean Value Theorem: Limiting θ(h) to 1/2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) by analyzing the limit of θ(h) as h approaches 0, specifically showing that lim(h→0) θ(h) = 1/2 when the second derivative f''(a) exists and is non-zero. The participants explore the relationship between the first and second derivatives, utilizing the definition of the derivative and L'Hôpital's rule to derive necessary expressions. The key conclusion is that understanding the behavior of θ(h) is crucial for proving the MVT under the specified conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Mean Value Theorem in calculus
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their definitions
  • Familiarity with L'Hôpital's rule for evaluating limits
  • Basic concepts of continuity and differentiability of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Mean Value Theorem and its applications in calculus
  • Learn about L'Hôpital's rule and its use in limit evaluation
  • Explore the implications of the second derivative in function behavior
  • Investigate the relationship between first and second derivatives in detail
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of the Mean Value Theorem and its proof techniques.

kazuyak
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose that the conditions for the Mean Value Theorem hold for the function
f : [a, a + h] → R, so that for some θ ∈ (0, 1) we have f (a + h) − f (a) = hf ′ (a + θh).
Fix f and a, and for each non-zero h write θ(h) for a corresponding value of θ.
Prove that if f ′′ (a) exists and is non-zero then lim(h→0) θ(h) = 1/2 .

I have no clue how to handle this problem. Could anyone please give me some hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second derivative is, of course, the derivative of the first derivative. That is,
[tex]\frac{d^2f}{dx^2}(a)= \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f'(a+h)- f'(a)}{h}[/itex]<br /> <br /> But you know that [itex]hf'(a+\theta h)= f(a+ h)- f(a)[/itex] so that [itex]f'(a+ \theta h)= (f(a+h)- f(a))/h[/itex].<br /> <br /> Replace f'(a+h) and f'(a) with variations on that.[/tex]
 
Do you mean that from f'(a+θh)=(f(a+h)-f(a))/h,
we get that f'(a)=(f(a+(1-θ)h)-f(a-θh))/h, f'(a+h)=(f(a+(2-θ)h)-f(a+(1-θ)h))/h
and than get f''(a) using l'hopital's rule? I doubt I'm doing what you mean, since it's leading me nowhere. Could you please give me some further hints?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K