Proving the Number of Functions from X to Y

  • Thread starter Thread starter adarshtr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
adarshtr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
n(X)=p and n(Y)=q then the no. of function from X-> Y is q^p , how do u prove this ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show your work so far and we can be of more help. As a hint, consider an element of X; how many choices are there for its image?
 
Ok , Here is what I've tried to do ,

the the function with max. no. of elements from these 2 sets should be a many-one on-to function right ? The no. of elements in that set(function) should be p*q(if the no of elements in 1st set is p and 2nd is q) , and i think that all other functions from these 2 sets should be subsets of this.

Considering this as a relation (and not a function) the no. subsets should be 2^mn . but for this relation to be a function there should be all the elements of set X in the ordered pairs which are the elements of the relation .

But using this logic and using cobinations I can't seem to get to the result q^p
 
You might find it easier to start with my previous suggestion: Take an element of X; how many choices are there for its image in Y?
 
Oh , didn't realize that this was this simple :( , so the no. chances of images for an element is q ,so the total no. of chances is q*q*q...*q p times . Thanks for the help
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top