Proving the scaling property of the Delta function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the scaling property of the Delta function, specifically that δ(at) = (1/|a|)δ(t). Participants clarify that the integral involving the Delta function is defined only at t = 0, leading to confusion about the presence of 'a' in the evaluation. A substitution of variables is suggested to simplify the integral, demonstrating that constants can be factored out during integration. The absolute value of 'a' is explained as necessary due to the potential change in integration limits when 'a' is negative, ensuring the correct orientation of the integral. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these transformations to validate the scaling property.
caesius
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that \delta(at)=\frac{1}{abs(a)}\delta(t)

Hint: Show that \int\phi(t)\delta(at)dt=\frac{1}{abs(a)}\phi(0)

(the limits of integration are from -inf to +inf btw, I couldn't find how to put them in..)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok. I understand that the integral is only defined for at = 0, i.e., t = 0. But if I follow this logical then I evaluate the integral to be phi(0), not phi(0)/a. Where does the a come from?

And I'm not entirely sure how proving that relationship helps with the proof of the scaling function...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That trick only works when the argument to the delta is the bare integration variable.
So try substituting u = a t, so you get something like
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(u) \delta(u) \, du = f(0)
(and click the formula to see how I did the boundaries)
 
Ok I've substituted x = at, now I get

<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\phi(\frac{x}{a})\delta(x)d\frac{x}{a} = \frac{1}{a}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\phi(\frac{x}{a})\delta(x)dx = \frac{1}{a}\phi(\frac{0}{a}) = \frac{1}{a}\phi(0)<br />

I don't quite see how I'm allowed to take the 1/a out of the d/dx operater and put it at the front though. And why should it be the abs(a) not a?

And I still can't see how this helps prove anything.

Cheers, Benjamin
 
You are allowed to take the a outside, because it is just a constant: du = a dt, so dt = (1/a) du, and you can put constants outside the integration as in
\int \tfrac12 x^2 \, dx = \tfrac12 \int x^2 \, dx

The absolute value of a comes from transforming the integration boundaries. If a < 0, then -infinity goes to +infinity in the transformed integral, and vice versa. However, in the final formula you simply want -infinity to be the lower boundary, and +infinity as the upper boundary. So if a < 0 you have to swap them, at the cost of a minus sign, whereas for a > 0 you don't. Do you have to multiply the whole thing by sgn(a), and then you can shorten sgn(a) / a to 1/abs(a).
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K