Proving the Summation Formula for 1/(n(n+1)) Using Mathematical Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter knowledgeSeeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
knowledgeSeeker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Need help with proof by mathematical induction that (1/(1*2)) + (1/(2*3)) + ... + (1/(n(n+1)) = (n/(n+ 1)) for all integers n >= 1.

Basis step: for n = 1: (1/(1*2)) = 1/2 and (1/(1+1) = 1/2, hence property is true for n = 1.

Inductive step: want to show that for alll integers k >= 1, if n = k is true then n = k + 1 is true. How do I prove? Believe I want to show (1/(1*2)) + (1/(2*3)) + [1/((k+1)((k+1)+1)] = [(k + 1)/((k+1) + 1)], but how??

Thank you for any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have shown that P(1) is true. Now you want to show that if you assume that P(k) is true, it follows that P(k+1) is true. So first write the expression for P(k), which you assume to be true. Then add the next number in the series (to both sides), and see if you can rearrange the expression on the right side into the form that you are trying to prove.
 
Let Sk= 1/(1*2)+ 1/(2*3)+ ...+ 1/(k(k+1)), the sum for n= k
Then S(k+1)= 1/(1*2)+ ...+ 1/(k)(k+1)+ 1/((k+1)((k+1)+1)= Sk+ 1/((k+1)(k+2))

By your "induction hypothesis", Sk= k/(k+1).

What is k/(k+1)+ 1/((k+1)(k+2)) ?
 
Thank you. Proved both sides = (k+1)/(k+2). Hence, true for n = k +1 and since both basis and inductive steps true, true for all n >= 1. :smile:
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top