Proving the Truth: The Relationship Between Quadratic Equations and Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter lLovePhysics
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When b² - 4ac = 0 and a is not equal to 0, the quadratic equation y = ax² + bx + c has exactly one x-intercept. This is confirmed by the quadratic formula, which simplifies to x = -b/(2a) when the discriminant is zero, indicating a unique solution. A participant argues against this by suggesting that if a were 0, the equation would represent a straight line, but the condition specifies a ≠ 0. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the discriminant in determining the nature of the roots of a quadratic equation. Overall, the relationship between quadratic equations and their graphs is clarified through the properties of the discriminant.
lLovePhysics
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
If b^{2}-4ac=0 and a is not equal to 0, then the graph of y=ax^{2}+bx +c has only one x-intercept.

I say it is true because, according to the quadratic formula, x would equal \frac{-b}{2a}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure. The quadratic formula tells us the X intercepts are when

x=\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}

So if b^2 - 4ac = 0

Then we are left with

x=\frac{-b}{2a}

Which is a unique solution.
 
disagree

lLovePhysics said:
If b^{2}-4ac=0 and a is not equal to 0, then the graph of y=ax^{2}+bx +c has only one x-intercept.

I say it is true because, according to the quadratic formula, x would equal \frac{-b}{2a}.

i say no.if we let a=0 the x^2 variable vanishes and we are left with a straight line.
 
Last edited:
Well he specified "and a is not equal to 0" in the original post
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top