Proving the Uniqueness of a System of Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the uniqueness of a solution for a system of equations that includes exponential and logarithmic functions, with a specific condition on a parameter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the solutions and consider the implications of the parameter a. One participant suggests analyzing a derived function and its derivative to explore the existence of solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to understand the problem better. One participant has acknowledged a misunderstanding in their earlier reasoning, indicating a shift in their understanding.

Contextual Notes

There is a specific condition mentioned (a > 0) that is central to the uniqueness claim, and participants are examining the implications of this condition on the system of equations.

VietDao29
Homework Helper
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
3
Here's a problem from one of the last (or previous of last) year, which bothers me ssssssoooooooo much. I've been working on this like a day or so, and haven't progressed very far. So, I'd be very glad if someone can give me a push on this.

[tex]\left\{ \begin{array}{ccc} e ^ x - e ^ y & = & \ln(1 + x) - \ln(1 + y) \\ y - x & = & a \end{array} \right.[/tex]

Prove that if a > 0, then the system of equation above has only one set of solution (x, y).
Thanks a lot. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So what have you tried? I've only looked at it briefly, but it appears to always have exactly one solution.
 
I don't know if this help, or if you tried it, but consider this function :
F(y)=Exp(y+a)+Exp(y) - Ln(1+y+a)+Ln(1+y)
try to look up the derivative and see if you deduce anything from it.
for example if the derivative is strictly positive or negative, then you can say that there exist one solution over ]-1, infinity[ that f(y)=0
need further exploration..
 
Last edited:
Whoops, :blushing:, ok, I finally get it.
Did mess up with some signs. woot >"<
Thanks everyone. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K