Proving the Work-Energy Theorem A lot of calculus, anyone?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the work-energy theorem for a particle moving along a curved path under a net force. The theorem states that the total work done (Wtot) equals the change in kinetic energy (K2 - K1). Participants emphasize the need to understand line integrals and parametrization to derive the relationship between force and work. A suggested approach involves using the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and displacement to simplify the integral. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying calculus concepts to validate the theorem.
Elysian
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle moves on a curved path from (x1, y1,z1) to (x2, y2,z2). At the start, the particle has a velocity of v = v1xi+v1yj+v1zk. This curved path can be divided into segments infinitesimally, which are, dl = dxi +dyj +dzk. It is acted on by a net force F = Fxj + Fyi + Fzk. The force components Fx, Fy, and Fz, are in general functions of position. Prove the work energy theorem for this general case. That is prove that

Wtot=K2-K1

where

Wtot=\intF dl = \int Fxdx + Fydy + Fzdz

where the limits of integration are from (x1, y1,z1) to (x2, y2,z2) for each.

Homework Equations



W = Fd
∫F=W

ax= \stackrel{dvx}{dt} = \stackrel{dvx}{dx} *\stackrel{dx}{dt} = vx\stackrel{dvx}{dx}

The Attempt at a Solution




I don't really have any idea where to start but what I did was I took the velocities and made them into accelerations then changed the Fx, Fy, and Fz, into max, may, and maz values, then I'm confused now because I have an integral which looks like this..

\int m*vx*dvx + m*vy*dvy/dx dy + m*vz*dvz/dx dz

which makes no sense because the dx only canceled out for the X direction, and I need to prove that Wtot = 1/2 mvf^2 - 1/2mvi^2


If anyone could help it'd be appreciated because I've got really no idea what I am doing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bolded means vectors. Note that x = (x1,x2,...xn). The period denotes dot product.

Let W = ∫F.dx
F = m(d2x/dt2)

W = m∫(d2x/dt2).dx
W = m∫(dv/dt).dx

Note that this step is somewhat hand-wavy but it's true. I think it would be a good exercise for you to prove this. To do that, you first need to learn about how line integrals work, and the process of parametrization. Hint: dx=(dx/dt)dt

W = m∫dv.(dx/dt)
W = m∫(dx/dt).dv
W = m∫v.dv
W = m(1/2 v.v) = 1/2 m|v|2

Is your name Ping?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top