Proving various properties of complex numbers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the property of complex numbers that states (1/z)* = 1/(z*), where z* is the complex conjugate of z. Participants are exploring the nature of complex conjugates and the algebraic manipulation involved in this proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest using algebraic methods to establish the identity, while others question the assumptions made in the original poster's reasoning. There is a focus on separating real and imaginary parts to clarify the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the proof algebraically. There is an acknowledgment of the need to avoid assuming the result being proven and to clarify the definitions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster finds the proof straightforward but is seeking formal methods to present it. There is a mention of previous parts of the problem that involved graphical representations and Euler's identity, which may not apply here.

Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



This problem is very easy, but I'm not sure how best to "prove" it. This part of the question just states:
Prove that (1/z)* = 1/(z*) where z* is the complex conjugate of z.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So the complex conjugate of z = x + iy is defined is z* = x - iy. That is, the complex conjugate of something is just making the complex part the opposite sign. So clearly, if you have 1/(x+iy) the complex conjugate would be to make the imaginary part negative, so 1/(x-iy), which clearly is equal to 1/z*.

The answer seems far too straight forward to warrant some formal "proof" but as the question is asking for a proof, I was wondering how you would go about doing it? For previous parts of this problem, such as proving that z* = re-i\theta, I could prove by graphing z and z* in the complex plane, then using Euler's identity of sines and cosines to rewrite those terms in terms of exponential functions and "prove" that way. However, I'm not sure how to "prove" this part of the problem as it seems way too straight forward.

Thanks for any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yosty22 said:

Homework Statement



This problem is very easy, but I'm not sure how best to "prove" it. This part of the question just states:
Prove that (1/z)* = 1/(z*) where z* is the complex conjugate of z.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So the complex conjugate of z = x + iy is defined is z* = x - iy. That is, the complex conjugate of something is just making the complex part the opposite sign. So clearly, if you have 1/(x+iy) the complex conjugate would be to make the imaginary part negative, so 1/(x-iy), which clearly is equal to 1/z*.

The answer seems far too straight forward to warrant some formal "proof" but as the question is asking for a proof, I was wondering how you would go about doing it? For previous parts of this problem, such as proving that z* = re-i\theta, I could prove by graphing z and z* in the complex plane, then using Euler's identity of sines and cosines to rewrite those terms in terms of exponential functions and "prove" that way. However, I'm not sure how to "prove" this part of the problem as it seems way too straight forward.

Thanks for any advice.

I don't think you have to graph anything. By using z and z* in rectangular form, you should be able to establish the stated identity algebraically.
 
Yosty22 said:
Prove that (1/z)* = 1/(z*) ...So clearly, if you have 1/(x+iy) the complex conjugate would be to make the imaginary part negative, so 1/(x-iy), which clearly is equal to 1/z*.
You are assuming what you are trying to prove here.
I would recommend algebraically showing that ## \frac {1}{x-iy}=\left(\frac {1}{x+iy}\right)^* ## by separating the latter into its real and imaginary parts.
 
To elaborate on what RUber said, all you can really assume as far as conjugation goes is ##(u+iv)^* = u-iv##. ##1/(x+iy)## isn't of the form ##u+iv##, so you can't simply replace ##iy## with ##-iy## and claim it's equal to the conjugate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K