Proving vectors are orthogonal

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Jacobian matrix of a transformation involving variables u, v, and w, and demonstrating that the columns of this matrix represent orthogonal vectors. Participants are exploring the mathematical properties of the matrix and the conditions for orthogonality.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the dot product of the first two columns of the Jacobian matrix to establish orthogonality. There is an exploration of the conditions under which the resulting expressions equal zero.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the calculations needed to verify orthogonality and the conditions for unit vectors. There is ongoing exploration of the definitions and properties of unit vectors, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are questions regarding the values of u, v, and w and how they affect the calculations. Participants are also considering the implications of the definitions of unit vectors and the conditions necessary for vectors to be orthogonal.

psycho81
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



first the question asks find the jacobian matrix of

(ucosv)
(usinv )
( w )
i have the matrix

( cos(v) , -usin(v) , 0)
( sin(v) , ucos(v) , 0)
( 0 , 0 , 1)

the question asks to show that the columns are orthogonal vectors, doing the dot product column 1 and 2 with 3 is easy because of the 0's, but how do I dot product the 1st two vectors?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(cosv x -usinv) + (sinv x ucosv) + (0 x 0) = 0

would just this suffice you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thats F(u,v,w) at the start
 
psycho81 said:

Homework Statement



first the question asks find the jacobian matrix of

(ucosv)
(usinv )
( w )
i have the matrix

( cos(v) , -usin(v) , 0)
( sin(v) , ucos(v) , 0)
( 0 , 0 , 1)

the question asks to show that the columns are orthogonal vectors, doing the dot product column 1 and 2 with 3 is easy because of the 0's, but how do I dot product the 1st two vectors?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(cosv x -usinv) + (sinv x ucosv) + (0 x 0) = 0

would just this suffice you think?
Well, why not do the multiplication:
-u cos v sin v+ u cos v sin v= 0.
 
thanks, now I have to calculate the corresponding unit vectors

would that just be

eu= (sqrt( cos2v + sin2v+0)) = 1

ev = (sqrt(-usin2v + ucos2v +0)) =1

ew = (sqrt( 0 + 0 + 12) = 1

or have i done this wrong?
 
Last edited:
in order to be a unit vector

sqrt(cos2v+sin2v)=1

sqrt(v) = 1

so v must be 1?

am in on the right track?
 
You don't put it equal to one. Secondly, a vector is a vector, a set of coordinates. Not a scalar.
A unit vector is a vector whose absolute value of the magnitude is equal to one, meaning the square root of the coordinates squared and then summed up should be 1.
For example (1, 1, 0). sqrt((1^2)+(1^2)+(0^2))=sqrt(2) and is not equal to 1.
Therefor to turn it into a unit vector you have to divide it by the absolute value of the magnitude, which here is sqrt(2).
So (1, 1, 0) is a vector. (1/sqrt(2))*(1, 1, 0) is a unit vector.
Hope you understand. Good luck!
 
how can you give it an absolute value of the magnitude when you don't know what u, v, or w is though? or do you just set them to 1
 
ahhh so it would be over sqrt(v)??

and sqrt(uv)

and the last one already has length 1?

please be right I am starting to lose the will to live.
 
You have your matrix:
( cos(v) , -usin(v) , 0)
( sin(v) , ucos(v) , 0)
( 0 , 0 , 1)

Your vectors are (cos(v), sin(v), 0), (-usin(v), ucos(v), 0) and (0, 0, 1)

(0, 0, 1) is obviously already a unit vector.

sqrt(cos^2(v) + sin^2(v)) = sqrt(1) = 1
=> so (cos(v), sin(v), 0) is already a unit vector as well.

sqrt((-usin(v))^2 + (ucos(v))^2) = sqrt(u^2 * sin^2(v) + u^2 + cos^2(v))
= sqrt(u^2 * (sin^2(v) + cos^2(v)) = sqrt(u^2) = u

Therefor 1/u * (-usin(v), ucos(v), 0) is a unit vector.

You can test this yourself, since you already know that the magnitude is u that means that the magnitude of 1/u * (-usin(v), ucos(v), 0) is equal to u/u which is equal to 1.
That's the reason you have to divide by the length of the vector to get a unit vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K