Proving Wien's Law Includes Stefan-Boltzmann & Wien's Displacement Laws

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that Wien's Law, represented as P(λ,T) = f(λT)/λ^5, encompasses both Stefan-Boltzmann's Law, R(T) = σT^4, and Wien's Displacement Law, λ_max T = b. The user seeks to find the derivative of P(λ,T) to determine when the slope is zero, indicating the peak wavelength. The derivative of P(λ,T) = (8πkT)/λ^4 with respect to λ is calculated, leading to a critical understanding of the relationship between these laws. The conversation highlights the need to incorporate Planck's equation for a complete analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wien's Law and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with Stefan-Boltzmann's Law and its implications
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Basic concepts of Planck's Law and blackbody radiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Planck's Law and its role in blackbody radiation
  • Learn about the derivation of Wien's Displacement Law
  • Explore the implications of the ultraviolet catastrophe in thermal radiation
  • Investigate the relationship between temperature and radiation intensity in blackbody models
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students studying thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of thermal radiation laws.

O_o
Messages
32
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I'm supposed to prove that Wien's Law: P(\lambda,T) = \frac{f(\lambda T)}{\lambda^5} includes Stefan-Botlzmann's Law R(T) = \sigma T^4 and Wien's Displacement Law: \lambda_{max} T = b

For Wien's Displacement Law:

I know that I would have to find when P(\lambda ,T) graphed against \lambda has a slope of 0. So I think I need to find the derivative with respect to \lambda. But the only two equations for P(\lambda,T) I have are P(\lambda,T) = \frac{f(\lambda T)}{\lambda^5} and P(\lambda,T) = \frac{8\pi kT}{\lambda^4}

So if I take the derivative of P(\lambda,T) = \frac{8\pi kT}{\lambda^4} with respect to \lambda I have
8\pi kT} * (-4) * \lambda^{-5} = 0 Where I'm guessing that everything except \lambda is being held constant and I don't know what to do from there.

Any hints or corrections of things I said would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to start with Planck's equation, which may be part of the f() function, above. I don't think your expression for P in terms of T and lambda is correct (although it might represent Wien's guess). That function has no peak - it gives an "ultraviolet catastrophe" as lambda goes to zero - there is no lambda_max.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
974
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K