Proving x=z Using Boolean Algebra Properties

sjaguar13
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I think I am missing part of my notes, or at least I don't understand them:

if x+y = y+z and xy = xz, then x=z

x = (y+z)x Absorbtion (Don't really know where this is coming from)
x(y+z) Commutative
xy+xz Distributive
It stops here and starts again at:

yz+xz (I have no idea where this came from)
zy+zx Commutative
z(y+z) Distributive
(z+y)z Here is where it gets confusing. Where did the z+y come from?
z Proven previously
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sjaguar13 said:
I think I am missing part of my notes, or at least I don't understand them:

if x+y = y+z and xy = xz, then x=z
I think the easiest way of showing that is by using truth tables.

x = (y+z)x Absorbtion (Don't really know where this is coming from)
x + y = y + z --> x(x + y) = x(y + z). Note that the left hand side simplifies to x, hence the result above.

yz+xz (I have no idea where this came from)
x + y = y + z --> (x + y)z = (y + z)z. The left hand side equals what you have above. Note that the right hand side simplifies to z.

zy+zx Commutative
z(y+z) Distributive
(z+y)z Here is where it gets confusing. Where did the z+y come from?
Just rearrange the terms from the previous step, i.e. z(y + z) = (z + y)z.

It's not clear to me what is going on here. Are these the steps from an exercise in a book?

[edit]I just noticed that these are supposedly notes. I've never taken any notes in any maths. class (or most classes for that matter). I think it would do you wonders to understand what's happening here rather than deciphering what notes you're missing.[/edit]
 
Last edited:
It was an example the teacher did on the board, but I couldn't copy it down fast enough before it was time to go, so some of the lines I just scribbled and I am pretty sure some of the stuff is missing.
 
The solution for this problem

sjaguar13 said:
I think I am missing part of my notes, or at least I don't understand them:

if x+y = y+z and xy = xz, then x=z

x = (y+z)x Absorbtion (Don't really know where this is coming from)
x(y+z) Commutative
xy+xz Distributive
It stops here and starts again at:

yz+xz (I have no idea where this came from)
zy+zx Commutative
z(y+z) Distributive
(z+y)z Here is where it gets confusing. Where did the z+y come from?
z Proven previously


Here the first statement (x=z)it self is the place you all have missed. And it has the soution. Hence you might be starting this formula from the middle.
Becuse of that x=(y+z)x is your starting point.

xy+xz becomes yz+xz because (x=z;first statement) so you have put z instead of x for xy and you haven't chaned xz which is perfectly correct.

And zy+zx becomes (z+y)z because you can write zy+zx as (y+x)z and it can be written as (z+y)z just by replacing x with z (x=z;first statement)

If you have a doubt about this or if you have any problem regarding maths please mail me through the following e mail supundikadl@yahoo.co.uk
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
258
Back
Top