Proving Y is Dense in X: Let's See!

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the closure of a specific linear span, denoted as Y, is equal to a closed subspace X of the space \( l_1 \). The participants explore the implications of certain properties of sequences in X and the behavior of a functional in the dual space, focusing on the conditions under which elements belong to the closure of Y.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that Y is a subset of X, showing that arbitrary members of Y satisfy the condition defining X.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of a functional \( f \) vanishing on specific constructed vectors and suggests that continuity plays a role in deducing \( f(x) = 0 \) for any \( x \) in X.
  • Concerns are raised about whether the reasoning effectively proves that Y is dense in \( l_1 \) rather than just in X.
  • Further clarification is sought regarding the necessity of using the defining property of sequences in X during the proof.
  • Participants explore the convergence of the \( l_1 \)-norm of constructed elements to show that they approach elements in X.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the sufficiency of the arguments presented, particularly regarding the use of the properties of sequences in X and whether the proof effectively demonstrates the density of Y in \( l_1 \). The discussion remains unresolved as participants continue to refine their arguments.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the proof relies on continuity and the specific structure of sequences in X, which may not be fully addressed in the current reasoning. There is an emphasis on the need for careful consideration of the limits and convergence involved in the argument.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Let X be the subset of $$ l_{1}$$ consisting of those sequences $$(x_{n})$$such that

$$$$$$x_{1}+x_{3}+x_{5}+...=x_{2}+x_{4}+x_{6}+...$$

Let Y be the linear span of $${{e_{n}+e_{n+1}:n=1,2,...}}$$ where $$e_{n}$$ is the sequence with a 1 in the nth position, zeroes elsewhere.

You are given that X is a closed subspace, and you use the following result:
Let F be a subspace of E and x be in E. Suppose that for all maps f in the dual space of E satisfying f(y)=0 for all y in F, we have that f(x)=0. Then x is in the closure of Y.

Prove that the closure of Y is equal to X.

My work: I show Y is a subset of X: an aritrary member of Y is of the form:$$t_{1}(e_{1}+e_{2})+...+t_{k}(e_{k}+e_{k+1})$$$$$$ and its easy to show that the sum of the odd positioned terms is equal to the even positioned ones.

So since X is closed, the closure of Y is contained in X. Now I use result with X in place of E and Y in place of F. So let f in the dual of X satisfy f(y)=0 for all y in Y.
taking k=1, then k=2, and so in the above, we see this implies that $$f(e_{n}+e_{n+1})=0$$ for all n. Can anyone help me finish to show f(x)=0 for any x in X?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermat said:
Let X be the subset of $$ l_{1}$$ consisting of those sequences $$(x_{n})$$such that

$$x_{1}+x_{3}+x_{5}+...=x_{2}+x_{4}+x_{6}+...$$

Let Y be the linear span of $${{e_{n}+e_{n+1}:n=1,2,...}}$$ where $$e_{n}$$ is the sequence with a 1 in the nth position, zeroes elsewhere.

You are given that X is a closed subspace, and you use the following result:
Let F be a subspace of E and x be in E. Suppose that for all maps f in the dual space of E satisfying f(y)=0 for all y in F, we have that f(x)=0. Then x is in the closure of Y.

Prove that the closure of Y is equal to X.

My work: I show Y is a subset of X: an aritrary member of Y is of the form:$$t_{1}(e_{1}+e_{2})+...+t_{k}(e_{k}+e_{k+1})$$ and its easy to show that the sum of the odd positioned terms is equal to the even positioned ones.

So since X is closed, the closure of Y is contained in X. Now I use result with X in place of E and Y in place of F. So let f in the dual of X satisfy f(y)=0 for all y in Y.
taking k=1, then k=2, and so in the above, we see this implies that $$f(e_{n}+e_{n+1})=0$$ for all n. Can anyone help me finish to show f(x)=0 for any x in X?

Thanks
The function $f$ vanishes on $x_1(e_1 + e_2)$. It also vanishes on $(x_2-x_1)(e_2+e_3)$, on $(x_3-x_2+x_1)(e_3+e_4)$, and on $(x_4-x_3+x_2 - x_1)(e_4+e_5)$, and so on. So it vanishes on the sum of the first $n$ vectors constructed in that way, and (by continuity) on the limit of those sums as $n\to\infty$.
 
Opalg said:
The function $f$ vanishes on $x_1(e_1 + e_2)$. It also vanishes on $(x_2-x_1)(e_2+e_3)$, on $(x_3-x_2+x_1)(e_3+e_4)$, and on $(x_4-x_3+x_2 - x_1)(e_4+e_5)$, and so on. So it vanishes on the sum of the first $n$ vectors constructed in that way, and (by continuity) on the limit of those sums as $n\to\infty$.

Thanks opalg, I think I reasoned this way but rejected it because it doesn't use ther fact that x in X satisfies$$x_{1}+x_{3}+...=x_{2}+x_{4}+...$$ so are you not effectively proving Y is dense in $$l_1$$?
 
Do you have an answer to that? (I'm not being impatient but looking at my response you might mistake it for 'I'm satisfied, thanks')
 
Fermat said:
Thanks opalg, I think I reasoned this way but rejected it because it doesn't use ther fact that x in X satisfies $$x_{1}+x_{3}+...=x_{2}+x_{4}+...$$ so are you not effectively proving Y is dense in $$l_1$$?
That fact comes in at the end, when you have to use the continuity of $f$ to deduce that $f(x)=0$. At that stage, you will have found an element $$z_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n+1} \alpha_ke_k \in \ker(f)$$, where $\alpha_k = x_k$ for $k\leqslant n$ and $\alpha_{n+1} = x_n-x_{n-1} + x_{n-2} - \ldots .$ You have to show that the $l_1$-norm $\|z_n-x\|_1$ goes to $0$ as $n\to\infty.$
 
Opalg said:
That fact comes in at the end, when you have to use the continuity of $f$ to deduce that $f(x)=0$. At that stage, you will have found an element $$z_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n+1} \alpha_ke_k \in \ker(f)$$, where $\alpha_k = x_k$ for $k\leqslant n$ and $\alpha_{n+1} = x_n-x_{n-1} + x_{n-2} - \ldots .$ You have to show that the $l_1$-norm $\|z_n-x\|_1$ goes to $0$ as $n\to\infty.$

The norm has only one term$$: |x_{n}-x_{n-1}+...|->0$$ since x is in X.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K