I Pullback of Vector Field in Relativity: Restrictions?

Pencilvester
Messages
205
Reaction score
47
TL;DR Summary
Shouldn’t the pullback of a vector (and pushforward of scalar and form, etc.) be easily definable for coordinate transformations?
Since coordinate transformations should be one-to-one and therefore invertible, wouldn’t there be no restriction on pushforwarding or pullbacking whatever fields we feel like (within the context of coordinate transformations)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pullbacks and pushforwards in differential geometry deal with maps between manifolds, not coordinate transformations.

That being said, if you have a smooth map from a manifold onto itself (such as defined by the flow of a vector field), then you can make pushforwards in either direction based on the function or its inverse. This is necessary for example for Lie derivatives of general tensors.
 
  • Like
Likes Pencilvester
Just wanted to make sure, thanks!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top