Pulley problem (Two masses acting on a third body)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of force exerted by two 5 kg masses acting on a dynamometer in a pulley system. The correct force measurement is 98.1 N, derived from the combined weight of the two masses (5 kg each), resulting in a total force of 10 kg or 98.1 N due to gravity. The initial confusion stemmed from a misunderstanding of the relationship between tension and weight, which was clarified through peer discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of force, mass, and weight
  • Familiarity with pulley systems and their mechanics
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (kg to N)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Newton's second law of motion
  • Learn about tension in pulley systems and its calculations
  • Explore real-world applications of dynamometers in physics
  • Review examples of force diagrams and free-body diagrams
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of forces in pulley systems.

J_Archer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
First off,I would like to apologise for not introducing myself.
I have yet to find that certain part of the forum,but if the mistake was on my part,mods please direct me.

Now to go to the real issue.


This is something I've long "gotten over",meaning it was in the introductory lessons in college,I forgot about it,but honestly it never "clicked".

My teacher gave me a real bad explanation.



In the attached picture,the two objects with m=5kg ,are pulling a third object,or to be precise a dynometer.
What amount of force will the dynometer show?

The teachers answer was 50Nm(49.05Nm) ,but somehow the number 98.1Nm is going around my brain.

I don't think I have enough credentials to contradict him,and honestly don't know If I am right,doubt it somehow,but there's this part of my brain that just can't let it go.

So ,if you would be so kind as to give me the correct answer and a good explanation.

Thank you very much.

(Also,I apologise for any technical terms I might have misspelled or missed entirely,English is my second language)
 

Attachments

  • 3rd law.jpg
    3rd law.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 496
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks.

I gave it a good solid thought for the past hour or so,and gotten to the same conclusion,but was still a bit iffy,this assured me though.

I'm actually a bit ashamed now,strange how sometimes we can't even grasp the simplest of things but yet try to go for the more complex.

Oh well,all a part of the human experience...

EDIT: To elaborate my train of thought,in case someone else might be going through the same konundrum.
Since I expected 49.05Nm from one weight,98.1 was an immediate thought linked to two weights,but it took me an imaginary wall to realize that the weight was,let's put it,all ready there,just in a different form.
And of course then it hit me that I was measuring the force of reaction and not the actual weight.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K