Pulley Problem with External Force?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
Lori

Homework Statement



upload_2017-11-5_0-38-12.png

Homework Equations



Seen above

The Attempt at a Solution


Why is the force acting on block B = N + P + W =0? ?
Shouldn't it be B = -P-W+N?
So that P = -W+N=0
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-5_0-38-12.png
    upload_2017-11-5_0-38-12.png
    63.4 KB · Views: 1,354
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that the equation in the figure is a vector equation:
upload_2017-11-4_23-56-59.png


The three force vectors add to zero. But you are also correct that the magnitudes of these forces obey -P-W+N = 0.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-4_23-56-59.png
    upload_2017-11-4_23-56-59.png
    6.2 KB · Views: 990
TSny said:
Note that the equation in the figure is a vector equation:
View attachment 214382

The three force vectors add to zero. But you are also correct that the magnitudes of these forces obey -P-W+N = 0.
I realized after that! But, I'm still confused on how they got that P =150?
 
haruspex said:
The μs factor was omitted. It should read 11g=(P+12g)μs.
I'm still not sure how they calculated P=150 :/ Would appreciate it if anyone explained this one to me because I literally don't know how they added up and got 150. I tried multiplying the static friction too

Nevermind, i worked out the problem and figured thatP + W = Fn
Fƒ= μs×Fn
T=ƒ
T=Wa = 107.8=ƒ

Fn = Fƒ/Fƒs = 107.8/0.4 = 269.5
P = 269.5 - Wb = 269.5-117.6=251.9 N
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lori said:
I'm still not sure how they calculated P=150 :/ Would appreciate it if anyone explained this one to me because I literally don't know how they added up and got 150. I tried multiplying the static friction too
As haruspex noted, the equation 11g = P + 12g as given in the figure in post #1 is not correct; rather it should be 11g=(P+12g)μs.

Are you having trouble seeing where this equation comes from, or are you having trouble seeing how to solve this equation for P?
 
TSny said:
As haruspex noted, the equation 11g = P + 12g as given in the figure in post #1 is not correct; rather it should be 11g=(P+12g)μs.

Are you having trouble seeing where this equation comes from, or are you having trouble seeing how to solve this equation for P?
Yes, i had trouble with where the equation was coming from, so i just redid it and found the answer myself! let me know if i did it correct cause my physics isn't really strong , so sometimes i doubt myself.!
 
Lori said:
Nevermind, i worked out the problem and figured thatP + Wb = Fn
Ff = fs*Fn
T=f
T=Wa = 107.8=f

Fn = Ff/fs = 107.8/0.4 = 269.5
P = 269.5 - Wb = 269.5-117.6=251.9 N
Yes, that's it. Good.

(You use fs for μs. You can use the formatting toolbar to access Greek letters, subscripts, etc. Click on the symbol Σ at then end of the toolbar to access Greek letters and other math symbols.)
upload_2017-11-5_11-3-26.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-5_11-3-26.png
    upload_2017-11-5_11-3-26.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 867
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lori
TSny said:
Yes, that's it. Good.

(You use fs for μs. You can use the formatting toolbar to access Greek letters, subscripts, etc. Click on the symbol Σ at then end of the toolbar to access Greek letters and other math symbols.)
View attachment 214402
Thanks! I fixed it! I was actually wondering how to do that XD