- 22,823
- 14,864
It would be more accurate to say it would accelerate to the right due to the pull of the hanging mass. Of course, if the system starts at rest this will lead to it moving to the right.
The discussion revolves around a pulley system problem involving two masses, M and m, with different tensions in the strings. The original poster attempts to analyze the system using free body diagrams and kinematic equations to find the accelerations and tensions, while also considering the effects of friction and the mass of the pulley.
Participants have provided guidance on the relationship between tensions in the pulley system and have pointed out potential errors in the diagrams. There is an ongoing exploration of the forces acting on the pulley and the implications of support forces, with some participants suggesting to move forward with the problem while being aware of these factors.
There are constraints regarding the assumptions made about the pulley being massless and frictionless, and the discussion includes considerations of how support forces affect the system's equilibrium. The original poster also mentions an upcoming test, indicating a time constraint for resolving the problem.
I see. Ok, I wrote the sum of forces like this:Orodruin said:It would be more accurate to say it would accelerate to the right due to the pull of the hanging mass. Of course, if the system starts at rest this will lead to it moving to the right.
Sorry, I fixed it now. I'll try to be como careful. Now that it is fixed, is it correct?Orodruin said:No, you mixed up ##T_1## and ##T_2## from one step to the next. It may seem petty, but you have done this several times in this thread alone and you need to take better care with this or you will make mistakes that are relatively easy to avoid.
I guess I need to make both of them somehow equal. But I don't know where I can get that relation from. I guess that since there are two ##T_1## tensions on the right side of the middle pulley, then the second tension must be half ##T_1##?Orodruin said:Yes, but you need to find a relation between ##T_1## and ##T_2## to completely solve your system. Can you imagine where you can get such a relation from?
Yes, this is the FBD of the middle pulley. An ideal (massless pulley) has the force equation ##F = ma = 0 = T_2 - 2T_1##.Davidllerenav said:I guess I need to make both of them somehow equal. But I don't know where I can get that relation from. I guess that since there are two ##T_1## tensions on the right side of the middle pulley, then the second tension must be half ##T_1##?
I didn't knew that. So everytime I have a massless pulley I can assume that?Orodruin said:Yes, this is the FBD of the middle pulley. An ideal (massless pulley) has the force equation ##F = ma = 0 = T_2 - 2T_1##.
I think you need to double check the placement of your fingers on the keyboard ...Davidllerenav said:ecwrytumw
Sorry, I'm from my cellphone and didn't notice. I meant "everytime". So the forces cancel and the tensions also have that relationship?Orodruin said:I think you need to double check the placement of your fingers on the keyboard ...
But yes. Any time you have an ideal massless object, the forces acting on it need to cancel out.
The forces and torques cancel, so they may have a relationship, but not necessarily that one, exactly.Davidllerenav said:and the tensions also have that relationship?