Pulling out -1 from denominator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob1182006
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mathematical manipulation of fractions, specifically factoring out -1 from the denominator. It asserts that the equation a/(b-c) = -1 * a/(c-b) holds true, emphasizing the consistency of this manipulation with basic algebraic principles. The conversation highlights a lack of instruction on this topic in educational settings, prompting curiosity about its validity. Participants suggest proving related statements to reinforce understanding. Overall, the manipulation of negative signs in fractions is affirmed as a valid mathematical operation.
bob1182006
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
I know this might seem trivial but I've never had a teacher cover this even though I've had the whole "factor out -1 from numerator " class.

I was thinking of the cases but I haven't found a contradiction to:

\frac{a}{b-c}=-1\frac{a}{c-b}

so is this always true?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Obviously. After all (-x)/y=x/(-y)=-(x/y).
 
It's true. It's a special case of

\frac{1}{ab}=\frac1a\cdot\frac1b
 
thanks
I've always wondered about that...
for some reason no teacher I've had has ever done that manipulation.
 
You might try to prove the following statements:
\frac{1}{1}=1, \frac{1}{(-1)}=(-1)*\frac{1}{1}=(-1)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top