Purpose of Michelson-Morley Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abrowaqas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
abrowaqas
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
What is the purpose of Michelson-Morley Experiment?
Why it is called the failed experiment? what is the contradiction between Michelson-Morley and Einstein?
What is Ether in that experiment?
is it a liquid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abrowaqas said:
What is the purpose of Michelson-Morley Experiment?
Why it is called the failed experiment? what is the contradiction between Michelson-Morley and Einstein?
What is Ether in that experiment?
is it a liquid?
Most scientists at the time thought that light was a modulation of some kind of medium based on Maxwell's equations which they called the luminiferous ether. It was not a liquid in the sense that a liquid consists of molecules of matter that can move around. They thought that it was rigid prior to the experiment. They thought that it was universally stationary and that the Earth moved through it and so there should be an ether wind which would change during the day and during the different seasons.

MMX was designed to detect this ether wind but it failed to detect any ether wind, no matter what time of the day or what season the experiment was performed. Michelson concluded that the Earth must be dragging the ether along with it so that there was no wind detected, just like the Earth drags the air around with it so that there are not thousand-mile per hour winds on the earth.

However, Einstein came to a different conclusion. He said that there was no detectable ether wind because, in effect, no matter when they performed the experiment, it was just as though they were stationary in the ether. This, of course, seemed to be a contradiction but Einstein was able to show that there was no contradiction.
 
good reply...

but the contradiction part is not clear...

please tell me again that how Einstein theory of relativity is a reply to the MMX failure.
 
abrowaqas said:
good reply...

but the contradiction part is not clear...

please tell me again that how Einstein theory of relativity is a reply to the MMX failure.
MMX was designed to measure the wind caused by moving through the ether. Einstein simply said that everytime they made a measurement,
they were not moving through the ether, therefore, there was no ether wind, it was exactly the same as being at rest in the ether.

In other words, what seemed to be a contradiction between MMX and Einstein turned out not to be.
 
Last edited:
thanks

i got it now
 

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Michelson–Morley experiment and the velocity of the ether wind
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Michelson-Morley: Errors in Calculations?
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Did the Michelson-Morley Experiment Disprove the Ether Theory?
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Michelson Morley experiment and the Doppler effect
Replies
21
Views
2K
B Speed of Light: Michelson-Morley Experiment Revisited
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Questions on the Michelson Morley Experiment
Replies
47
Views
6K
I Understanding Michelson Morley Experiment
Replies
14
Views
3K
I Violation of Special Relativity Principle?
Replies
23
Views
2K
B Ether and Michelson-Morley experiment
Replies
15
Views
3K
I Learn Michelson Morley Exp: Best Books Explaining Light's C Speed
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top