Pushing more weight than you, does muscle matter?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between weight, friction, and the ability to exert force in a pulling scenario. The coefficient of friction between objects and the floor plays a critical role in determining movement outcomes. In a practical example, a lighter individual struggles to pull a heavier person due to insufficient friction, not a lack of strength. The conversation highlights the importance of weight in physical interactions, particularly in contexts involving friction. Ultimately, the conclusion emphasizes that muscle strength alone does not determine the ability to move heavier objects if weight and friction are not favorable.
moparhomo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
No need to make this question any more difficult than it needs to be. Simple, right? Please view the attachment, as it is the question.
 

Attachments

  • Jon is wrong.jpg
    Jon is wrong.jpg
    62.3 KB · Views: 542
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The questions seem ill-posed and/or incomplete.

The answer to the first question depends on the coefficient of friction between the plates and the floor. The answer may be one, both, or neither move.

For the second scenario, you haven't said what is trying to be accomplished. Assuming that you have the hydraulic actuator slowly being extended, the 200 lb weight will be pushed away from the 300 lb weight due to the difference in friction between each object and the floor.
 
Thats all I really needed to know. This started out as an argument between my cousin and I. We were both laying on the floor and trying to pull each other towards ourselves. I explained to him that the problem was that, not that I was not strong enough to pull him, but that I did not weigh enough. He weighs 230 pounds and I weight about 140. Every time I tried to pull him towards me, I just moved towards him. He kept saying, and actually believed it was because I was not strong enough. I set up many models to prove to him that he was wrong and that I was right. I would have loved to be proved wrong, but in this case I know that because of my weight, I could not have enough friction between myself and the floor. I really had no choice but to try and get someone else's opinion.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top