PV^K = C; K is always the same for a given gas, is the same true for C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter timsea81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas
AI Thread Summary
For an ideal gas undergoing adiabatic processes, the relationship PVK=C holds, where K is the specific heat ratio and C varies depending on the initial conditions of pressure and volume. The value of C is not a universal constant nor solely dependent on temperature, as it changes with different initial states of the gas. In adiabatic expansion, while temperature changes, C remains linked to the entropy of the gas and is defined by the initial values of pressure and volume. The equation C = PVK can be expressed in terms of temperature and volume, indicating that both parameters influence C during adiabatic changes. Ultimately, C is situation-dependent and varies among different adiabatic curves.
timsea81
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
For an ideal gas, PVK=C, where C is some constant and K is the ratio of the specific heats. K is obviously the same in all cases (all samples of helium have the same value of K, for example). Is the same true for C?

If you have 2 samples of the same gas, can the values of C be different for each if they are at different temperatures? What if they are at the same temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PVK = C holds when you have adiabatic expansion/compression of the gas. Therefore C cannot depend on T, because T changes in adiabatic expansion/compression. But it can't always be the same for some gas either, because if it were, if I told you the gas and what its pressure was, you would then know its volume, which certainly isn't true, even about the air around you. So C is neither a global constant, nor a function of T, it must depend on something else that is situation-dependent. Since adiabatic expansion means expansion at constant entropy, C must relate to the entropy of the gas.
 
for any gas before compression and after compression their specific heat ratios remains constant because we are considering the same gas at the one moment. so as long as we are treating same gas or substance it remains constant.
 
To start off-topic, in the isothermal case, PV = constant. Here the constant has a very neat interpretation. It is equal to nRT, so it is proportional to the kelvin temperature.

Now consider the adiabatic case, where PV\gamma = C. This is one curve of a family, with different family members having different values of C. Unlike the isothermal case, C has no neat interpretation, it is simply the value of PV\gamma along a particular curve. You could think of it as set by the initial values P0 and V0 and equal to, P0V0\gamma.

You were interested in relating C to T? All you can do is express C in terms of P and T or V and T instead of P and V. Let's go for V and T. Using the ideal gas equation:

C = PV\gamma = nRT V(\gamma - 1).

So C for a particular adiabatic curve isn't determined uniquely by the initial value of T; it depends also on the initial V. During the course of the adiabatic change, both T and V change such that nRT V(\gamma - 1) remains constant.

Any help?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Back
Top