PV work: differential vs instantaneous

  • Thread starter Thread starter gfd43tg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential Work
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences in calculating PV work for differential versus instantaneous processes involving a gas in a piston system. When weight is removed gradually, the process is reversible, allowing for the use of the equation W = nRT ∫dV/V, as pressure changes slowly. In contrast, an instantaneous release of the latch leads to an irreversible process where pressure is not uniform, complicating work calculations. For irreversible expansion, the pressure at the interface with the surroundings (pI) is used to determine work done, expressed as pIΔV. The key takeaway is that the nature of the process—reversible or irreversible—significantly impacts how PV work is calculated.
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48
Hello,

I am having a conceptual difficulty understanding the following scenario

Suppose you has a tank with a piston and some gas. In the first situation, there is some weight on the piston holding it down, and when you remove a differential amount of weight from the piston, you end up getting different PV work than if say the piston was latched, and then you suddenly release the latch. I suppose its due to the reversible vs. irreversible process,

In the case of the differential weight removal, the integral becomes

W = nRT ∫dV/V

Why could this not be done for the irreversible process? Is the nRT/V term supposed to indicate that the volume slowly changes, so the pressure is changing slowly, but for the irreversible process the pressure change is near instant?

In the latch case, I don't know when calculating the work done by the gas, if the work should be the initial pressure times change in volume, or the final pressure times change in volume, and why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the latch is removed and the gas expands irreversibly, the pressure is not even uniform spatially within the system, so what pressure do you use to calculate the work done on the surroundings? What you use is the pressure at the interface with the surroundings, pI. If the force per unit area at the interface is held constant in the irreversible expansion (say by expansion against a large volume of air), then the work is pIΔV.

If the process is carried out reversibly, then the pressure within the system is essentially perfectly uniform, and matches the pressure of the surroundings at the interface. This is the case that is approximated when the weights are removed incrementally.

For more details, see my Blog at my PF personal page.

Chet
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
468
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K