Q about diff. between ferro and paramagnetism under a strong mag field

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter parsa418
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Paramagnetism
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Ferromagnetic materials possess magnetic domains containing dipoles that are predominantly aligned, while paramagnetic materials lack these domains. Under a magnetic field, ferromagnetic domains that align with the field expand, whereas paramagnetic dipole moments align with the field but do not form domains. The discussion highlights that having domains in ferromagnetic materials does not enhance magnetization; rather, eliminating these domains is essential for achieving strong ferromagnetism. The concept of saturation magnetization is also addressed, indicating that it is related to the alignment of dipole moments under strong magnetic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ferromagnetism and paramagnetism
  • Familiarity with magnetic domains and dipole moments
  • Knowledge of saturation magnetization concepts
  • Basic grasp of exchange interaction in magnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of exchange interaction in ferromagnetism
  • Explore the concept of saturation magnetization in detail
  • Study the effects of magnetic domains on material properties
  • Investigate methods for eliminating magnetic domains in ferromagnetic materials
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and engineers interested in magnetic materials and their applications in technology.

parsa418
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi
From what I understand ferromagnetic materials have domains that contain magnetic dipoles that are almost all parallel to each other. However these domains have random directions.
Under a magnetic field the domains in the ferromagnetic material that are magnetized in the field direction grow and the domains that aren't shrink.
However, in a paramagnetic material there are no domains. Under a magnetic field a lot of the dipole moments of a paramagnetic material become parallel with the field.
My first question is what makes having domains in a material better for magnetization?
My second question is under a strong magnetic field shouldn't both paramagnetic materials and ferromagnetic materials become equally magnetized because eventually all the dipole moments of both materials become parallel with the magnetic field? (is saturation magnetization related to this?)
Any help will be much appreciated
Thank you
Parsa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Parsa! :smile:
parsa418 said:
My second question is under a strong magnetic field shouldn't both paramagnetic materials and ferromagnetic materials become equally magnetized because eventually all the dipole moments of both materials become parallel with the magnetic field? (is saturation magnetization related to this?)

I think it's only a question of degree …

both para and ferro depend on the exchange interaction (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange_interaction), and if it's strong enough you get ferro, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramagnetism#Relation_to_electron_spins
"If there is sufficient energy exchange between neighbouring dipoles they will interact, and may spontaneously align or anti-align and form magnetic domains, resulting in ferromagnetism (permanent magnets) or antiferromagnetism, respectively."​
My first question is what makes having domains in a material better for magnetization?

No, domains make it worse

to produce a strong ferromagnet, we need to eliminate the domains! :wink:
 
Thank you tiny-tim. Sorry for the late reply. I was travelling.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K