Q: How does short circuiting affect the potential difference in a circuit?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PainterGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Short
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of short circuiting on potential difference in electrical circuits, specifically focusing on the application of Ohm's law (V=IR) and the implications of current flow in short circuits. Participants explore theoretical concepts, clarify definitions, and raise questions about the nature of electric potential and energy in these scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the interpretation of the equation V=IR, noting that it provides the overall potential difference without indicating the direction of potential flow, suggesting that a more nuanced expression like V_ab = IR might be necessary.
  • One participant questions the assertion that electrons lose all their energy when reaching point b in a short circuit, proposing that they may retain some energy, and seeks clarification on how potential is defined in this context.
  • Another participant points out that in a short circuit, the current can become infinite, leading to practical issues like blown fuses or tripped circuit breakers.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of R=0 in the context of Ohm's law, with one participant questioning how current can flow without a voltage, while another asserts that V remains fixed, leading to an infinite current.
  • Participants explore the significance of the negative sign in the expression ΔV=-IR, suggesting it indicates a decrease in voltage in the direction of current flow, while also acknowledging that conventional usage often omits the sign in practical applications.
  • A more precise analysis using the differential form of Ohm's law is mentioned, which could clarify the directionality of the quantities involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the implications of Ohm's law and the nature of electric potential in short circuits. There is no clear consensus on the interpretation of potential energy and the effects of short circuiting, as multiple viewpoints and questions remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of potential and energy, as well as the assumptions made regarding the behavior of current and voltage in short circuits. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical implications of the equations presented.

PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
73
"V=IR" and "short circuiting"

hello

Q1:
to find the potential difference across a resistor with resistance R the equation V=IR is used. suppose the resistor is connected to terminals "a" and "b"; and the current is flowing from the point "a" toward point "b". that means point "b" has less potential. but the equation "V=IR" only tells us about the overall potential difference without any regard whether the p.d. is from high to low or from low to high. it's like enclosing the p.d. with modulus "|IR|". but when it is written "V_ab = IR" then attention is given the fact if postential different is from low to high, or from high to low. if current is flowing from a to b, then "IR" would be "-ive" and so on. is what i say correct? any help would be appreciated.

Q2:
when a battery's two terminals a and b are directly connected without any resistor. the current flows from a to b, and this is said to be short circuiting. electrons at point a has maximum potential and when they reach point b they almost have zero potential. i don't get that how we are sure that when electrons reach point b they has lost all their energy or potential. perhaps they still have some of the energy. could you please help me with this? any help is welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't really understand your questions. However in the equation V=IR, V and R are given and I is the result. In a short circuit it means the current is infinite - that's why fuses blow or circuit breaker break.
 


painterguy said:
Q1:
to find the potential difference across a resistor with resistance R the equation V=IR is used. suppose the resistor is connected to terminals "a" and "b"; and the current is flowing from the point "a" toward point "b". that means point "b" has less potential. but the equation "V=IR" only tells us about the overall potential difference without any regard whether the p.d. is from high to low or from low to high. it's like enclosing the p.d. with modulus "|IR|". but when it is written "V_ab = IR" then attention is given the fact if postential different is from low to high, or from high to low. if current is flowing from a to b, then "IR" would be "-ive" and so on. is what i say correct? any help would be appreciated.
I'm not entirely sure I understand you either, but I think you do have a point that usually when applying Ohm's law, you do only calculate the magnitude of the voltage difference, and then you use physical reasoning to determine which end is at the higher potential. It'd probably be more technically correct to write it as ΔV=-IR, since the voltage decreases in the direction of current flow.
 


Hi. I have a question to do with V=IR.

fairly simple. when R = 0 then current should flow most freely. But by this formula then the voltage should be 0. . . . but don't we need a voltage for current to flow?

what am i missing?

thanks
 


No, V is fixed. V= I(0) simply means that I will be (almost) infinite. That's why short circuits are bad things!
 


painterguy said:
Q2:
when a battery's two terminals a and b are directly connected without any resistor. the current flows from a to b, and this is said to be short circuiting. electrons at point a has maximum potential and when they reach point b they almost have zero potential. i don't get that how we are sure that when electrons reach point b they has lost all their energy or potential. perhaps they still have some of the energy. could you please help me with this? any help is welcome.
"Potential energy", even electric potential as here, is not an absolute quantity but is always relative to some fixed value. Here, we know that the electrons' potential at point b is 0 because point b is the reference value. Its potential is, by definition, 0.
 


diazona said:
I'm not entirely sure I understand you either, but I think you do have a point that usually when applying Ohm's law, you do only calculate the magnitude of the voltage difference, and then you use physical reasoning to determine which end is at the higher potential. It'd probably be more technically correct to write it as ΔV=-IR, since the voltage decreases in the direction of current flow.

thank you. why delta (v) = -IR, what is reason for including minus sign? could you please tell me? big thanks.
 


As I said, you could justify the minus sign because the voltage decreases in the direction of current flow. So, first you pick a direction to be the positive direction along the wire. If the current is flowing in that direction, you have a positive current, but then moving in the positive direction, the voltage decreases, and it is common to represent a decrease in voltage by a negative number. However, it's conventional to write the equation without the minus sign and to use physical arguments to determine the direction.

A more precise analysis would use the differential form of Ohm's law,
\vec{E} = \rho\vec{J}
Since the quantities involved here are vectors, there would be no ambiguity about the sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K