Q of tuning fork; resonant and natural frequency

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the Q factor of a tuning fork that resonates at 440Hz. The participant initially misinterpreted the problem by considering the natural frequency instead of the resonant frequency. Upon recalculating, they found a Q value of around 1000, which aligns with a professor's statement that the Q of a tuning fork is typically around 1000. However, the professor calculated a Q of approximately 7000 by correctly using 440Hz as the resonant frequency. The key takeaway is that the tuning fork's frequency remains constant, and understanding the distinction between resonant and natural frequencies is crucial for accurate Q factor calculations.
Agent M27
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A musicians tuning fork rings at A above middle C, 440Hz. A sound meter level meter indicates the sound intensity decreases by a factor of 5 in 4 seconds. What is Q of the tuning fork?


Homework Equations



Q=\frac{\omega}{2\beta}

\omega=\sqrt{\omega_{0}^{2}-2\beta^{2}}



The Attempt at a Solution



I understand how to solve this problem, I had the right answer if I chose the resonant frequency correctly to be 440Hz. Instead I understood the problem to be giving me the natural frequency since after a certain amount of time it equilibrated there, so to speak. Using this idea I solved for the resonant frequency and I got an answer on the order of 1000, which agrees with what my professor said in class, "the Q of a tuning fork is roughly 1000". However he took 440Hz as the resonant frequency and obtained a Q of roughly 7000. His answer was "because that is its resonant frequency" I kid you not, so I guess my understanding of the difference between the two is incorrect. So why is 440Hz the resonant frequency in this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tuning fork frequency does not change with time. If it starts at 440 it "ends" at 440. (I put "ends" in quot. marks since you are going after a linear solution which theoretically has no "end").

You need the expression for the time decay of the acoustic pressure. That decay is a function of Q.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K