[Q]Question about harmonic oscilator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter good_phy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Oscilator
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
good_phy
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi, Finally! I reached harmonic oscilator! Congratulation!

Most of all QM textbook introduced this formula :

Time independent energy eigenstate equation is

[tex]( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial}{\partial x) + \frac{Kx^2}{2} )\varphi = E\varphi[/tex]

(1)[itex]\varphi_{xx} = -k^2 \varphi[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\hbar^2k^2(x)}{2m} = E - \frac{K}{2}x^2 > 0[/itex]

We focused classically forbidden domain [itex]x^2 > x_{o}^2, E < \frac{Kx^2}{2}[/itex]

In this case, kinetic energy is negative, so [itex]\varphi_{xx} = k'^2 \varphi[/itex] [itex]\frac{\hbar^2k'^2}{2m} = \frac{K}{2}x^2 - E > 0[/itex]

For asymptotic domain, [itex]Kx^2/2 >> E[/itex]

(2) [itex]\varphi_{xx} = \frac{mK}{\hbar^2}\varphi = \beta^4x^2\varphi[/itex] where subscript means 2nd differential, [itex]\beta^2 = \frac{mw_{o}}{\hbar}[/itex]

We let (3) [itex]\epsilon = \beta x[/itex]

(2) appears as (4) [itex]\varphi_{\epsilon\epsilon} = \epsilon^2 \varphi[/itex]

If [itex]\epsilon >>1[/itex] then (2) is approximated to

(5) [itex]\varphi \approx Aexp(\pm\frac{\epsilon^2}{2}) = Aexp(\pm\frac{(\beta x)^2}{2})[/itex]

I have a question. Liboff said (2) become (4) by introducing (3). But If (3) is right, I thought (4) should be [itex]\varphi_{\epsilon\epsilon} = \beta^2\epsilon^2\varphi[/itex]. Is it right?

And I don't know how to derive (5) from (4). Please lead me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
good_phy said:
(2) [itex]\varphi_{xx} = \frac{mK}{\hbar^2}\varphi = \beta^4x^2\varphi[/itex] where subscript means 2nd differential, [itex]\beta^2 = \frac{mw_{o}}{\hbar}[/itex]

We let (3) [itex]\epsilon = \beta x[/itex]

(2) appears as (4) [itex]\varphi_{\epsilon\epsilon} = \epsilon^2 \varphi[/itex]

If [itex]\epsilon >>1[/itex] then (2) is approximated to

(5) [itex]\varphi \approx Aexp(\pm\frac{\epsilon^2}{2}) = Aexp(\pm\frac{(\beta x)^2}{2})[/itex]

I have a question. Liboff said (2) become (4) by introducing (3). But If (3) is right, I thought (4) should be [itex]\varphi_{\epsilon\epsilon} = \beta^2\epsilon^2\varphi[/itex]. Is it right?

And I don't know how to derive (5) from (4). Please lead me.

I don't have Liboff, but since you make substitution of variables from x to beta*epsilon, the second derivative on phi w.r.t to x will change..

[tex]\frac{d^2\phi}{dx^2} \rightarrow \beta ^2 \frac{d^2\phi}{d\epsilon^2}[/tex] (chain rule of calculus)

so it should be: [tex]\phi_{\epsilon\epsilon} = \epsilon^2 \phi[/tex]
 
Thank you for your help! I'm very pleased with you. But Could you tell me how to apply chain rule of calculus on that formula? I just subsitute [itex]x = \beta\epsilon[/itex] into the x of dominator to get your formula. is it right procedure?

What is more, Can you give me a answer of second question?
 
[tex]\frac{d\phi}{dx} = \frac{d\phi}{d\epsilon}\frac{d\epsilon}{dx}[/tex]

what the second question is about is that that "far" away from the potential, (classical allowed region) wave function must go down as an exponential.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:HarmOsziFunktionen.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator: