Jeff Rosenbury said:
I've always thought evolution left our minds with "weak" areas which bypass rationality. I think that's a good friendly definition of mysticism.
Being subject to such weaknesses, I've never seen evolution as blind.
I wonder if such weak areas are required for something as complex as the human mind? Or is a perfectly rational mind possible?
Wood burl.
I don't think that mysticism is a sign of weakness. In my opinion, it is one of the things that makes us human. Like emotions, those are not always rational, either. But without them, we would be like robots. Something would be missing.
I cannot give a proper reference but I've heard of an experiment with a man who has lost ability to feel emotions after an accident or disease, I'm not sure now. They found out that without emotions, he wasn't able to make decisions in daily life. This included things such as planning his daily activities, deciding where to eat etc. If there were no obvious rational reasons to go somewhere or avoid a place, he couldn't decide between two restaurants because he wasn't able to tell which one he likes more. This made his life more complicated than before.
And, while I am unfortunately not a scientist myself, I think that feeling awe in nature, which in my understanding, is a mystic experience, is one of the important factors that contributes to science.
Maybe many people would not become astronomers if they didn't feel a mystic experience when observing stars as kids. The same may be true about observing nature on earth, being fascinated by chemical reactions or observing flying birds.
Sure, many people chose science because of purely rational reasons or for money or because they want to become famous. But surely for many of them some kind of mystic experience was what motivated them first.
I like to consider myself a mystic and I am not ashamed of that. On the other hand, one has to use common sense at all times to prevent being irrational.