QFT Question: What is meant by dipole form ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spooky51
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Form Qft
spooky51
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
QFT Question: What is meant by "dipole form"?

Hello physics people! Probably a very basic question, but here goes.

I'm taking a course on QFT based on Ryder. I've heard my professor refer to propagators as having a "polar" or "dipole" form. Things like (k^2 - m^2 + ie)^(-1)

For anyone who has a copy of Ryder hand, the specific case I'm puzzling over at at the moment is equation 1.20 on page 16, where the text above says that the form factor G_M has a dipole form. ( G_M = (1+q^2/M_q^2)^(-1)).

I'm not sure what is meant by something having a polar/dipole form. I can't seem to find anything on google or wikipedia, but I might not be digging deep enough. Can someone shed some light on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The form factor is the Fourier transform of the charge distribution,

F(q) = ∫ρ(x) eiq·x d3x

For small q, (long wavelength photons) expand the exponential,

F(q) = ∫ρ(x)(1 + iq·x -(q·x)2/2 + ...) d3x

Keeping only these leading terms is called the dipole approximation. Assuming the charge distribution is spherically symmetric, you get a form factor,

F(q) = 1 + <r2> q2 + ...

where <r2> is the mean square radius of the charge cloud.

Whether you write it this way or in the denominator, (1 - <r2> q2)-1, the idea is the same. Keeping only the leading term in q2 is the dipole approximation.
 
Last edited:


what you say is dipole approximation which is essentially the point that atomic dimensions are small compared with wavelength.Moreover,the form factor also arises in rosenbluth formula where it has to do with the structured form of proton where form factors really has it's connection to anomalous magnetic moment and also the structure of charge distribution(there are two).I don't know what it has to do with the propagators of a fermion.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top