QFT : Why do tensors in lagrangian densities contract?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of index contraction in Lagrangian densities, specifically in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Participants highlight that the action must be a scalar quantity, which necessitates the contraction of indices in tensors and vectors, as illustrated by examples such as F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} and G^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu} G^{\mu\nu}_{\alpha}. The conversation also touches on the implications of gauge invariance and the nature of scalar quantities in theoretical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with tensor calculus
  • Knowledge of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Knowledge of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of scalar quantities in field theory
  • Explore gauge invariance in Lagrangian formulations
  • Learn about the role of index contraction in tensor analysis
  • Investigate the implications of non-invariant actions in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on quantum field theory and Lagrangian mechanics.

Hepth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
458
Reaction score
40
What is the general rule behind why for any given lagrangian (QED/QCD show this) that any vectors or tensors contract indices? I know it must be something simple, but I just can't think of it offhand.
QED :
[tex] F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
Proca (massive vector):
[tex] A_\mu A^\mu[/tex]
QCD :
[tex] G^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu} G^{\mu\nu}_{\alpha}[/tex]

Like could I imagine some non-real lagrangian that is [tex]B^{\mu\nu}B^{\mu}_{\nu}[/tex]
without worrying about gauge invariance?EDIT: its that the action has to be a scalar quantity, isn't it?
REEDIT: Ah its still a scalar though, just not NECESSARILY invariant.

Well then what about
[tex] B^{\mu}B_{\nu}[/tex]
so that you still get some 16 term scalar, but its not a similar-indice contraction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not a "16-term scalar" (which I don't think even makes sense). That's a tensor.

You answered your own question with "the action has to be a scalar".
 
Ok, just making sure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K