QM Measurement Problem: Expectation Value of Lz

  • Thread starter Thread starter y.moghadamnia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring
y.moghadamnia
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
hi there,
I have been studying the postulates of QM in shankar book, and in the part it explains how measurement affects the system, it talks alittle about the expectation value and the uncertainty. then I came across this problem which I don't get. it gives three L(in x direcion), L(in y direction) and L(in z direction) matrices and then asks " take the state in which Lx=1. In this state what is the expectation value of Lz?" I don't understand this part:
how knowing Lx can help us calculate the expectation value of Lz?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given the matrix that represents Lx, you can write down the unique vector (up to a phase factor) that is an eigenvector of Lx with eigenvalue 1. Then you can calculate the expectation of Lz for this eigenvector.
 
aha, so that's the way u got to look at it. guess I should solve more problems to understand the way of looking at the problems.I asked people if they had good problems to send me but no one answered.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top