QM Questions: Intro & Two Conceptual Issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter hotcommodity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intro Qm
hotcommodity
Messages
434
Reaction score
0
I'm preparing for an upcoming course in QM by working out of a textbook, and I've encountered a handful of conceptual questions that I'm having trouble answering. I figured it best to ask my questions in a single thread, so as not to clutter the subforum. Also, I chose the general physics subforum because it's unlikely that I'll be asking anything that may be considered advanced physics (but feel free to move the thread if need be).

To start with:

1. The wavelength of a matter wave is, of course, given by \lambda = \frac{h}{p}. If an object has zero momentum, does its wavelength get arbitrarily large? And if so, why doesn't its wave nature dominate?

2. Let's say that a beam of electrons are moving through a single slit (with a width comparable to the wavelength of the electron). The electrons would then show up all over the screen/detector that lay behind the single slit. Could we say that the electrons show up at all places on the screen at a constant rate? Or would we only be able to speak in terms of the average rate of electron detection for any given region on the screen?

Any help is welcome and appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) This is a bit of a trick question, what you should be asking yourself, is: Is it possible for something to have something with zero velocity? (think in the quantum realm, not classical)

2) For this one, remember that quantum mechanics is all about probability.
 
Another way of saying the same thing PiratePhysicist said, IF the momentum were 0, what would the uncertainty principle say about its postition?
 
Thank you both for the replies.

HallsofIvy said:
Another way of saying the same thing PiratePhysicist said, IF the momentum were 0, what would the uncertainty principle say about its postition?

If the momentum were zero, there would be zero uncertainty in the object's momentum, which would make the uncertainty in the object's position infinitely large. But I'm not sure what physical concept that reveals... Does it mean that the object is equally likely to be found anywhere?
 
Yeah, so basically, it's impossible to have something with zero velocity.
 
That makes sense, thank you.

I have another question in regard to the uncertainty principle.

3. My book states "Because the width of a diffraction pattern, related to \Delta p_x, is inversely proportional to the slit width, related to \Delta x, the uncertainties are inversely proportional. (using the example of a single slit pattern).

So my question is, when we're speaking of uncertainties in position and momentum, are we speaking of (a) the uncertainty in the position & momentum of the particle while it's in the slit? (b) the uncertainty in the position & momentum of the particle just after it leaves the slit? (c) the uncertainty in the position & momentum of the particle once it registers on the screen? Or (d) (As I believe the quote above implies) the uncertainty in the position of the particle while it's in the slit, and the uncertainty of the momentum of the particle as it registers on the screen?

Again, any help is appreciated.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top