Quadratic applications question

AI Thread Summary
The projectile's height is modeled by the equation -16t^2 + 320t, and the goal is to find when it returns to the ground, which occurs when the height equals zero. The equation simplifies to t(t - 20) = 0, yielding solutions t = 0 and t = 20 seconds. While t = 0 represents the launch time, t = 20 is the time when the projectile returns to the ground. Confusion arose regarding the verification of the solution, particularly in the interpretation of the equation's results. Ultimately, the correct time in the air before returning to the ground is confirmed to be 20 seconds.
ghostchaox
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A projectile is launched upward. Its height above the ground after t seconds is -16t^2 + 320t. After how many seconds in the air will it return to the ground? Solve algebraically.


Homework Equations


ax^2+bx+c=0 ?
-b (+/-) (Square root of b^2 -4ac)/2a ?


The Attempt at a Solution



t= -320 (+/-) (Square root of 320^2 -4(-16)(0)

t= -320 (+/-) 320/ -16
t= {0,20} ?

If i check it, it doesn't fit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its simpler this way.

0=-16t^2+320t

Divide both sides by -16

0=t^2-20t

0=t(t-20)

t=0,20

We get the same solutions, check it the long way by paper, maybe your calculators got errors. My solutions are verified by my calculator..
 
20=-16(20^2) + 320(20) ?
20= -6400+6400?
20=0?

20 =/= 0

0= -16(0^2) + 320(0) ?
0=0+0?
0=0


Now, since this is geometry, t(seconds) cannot equal 0 or else the time and distance would be also 0

If i plug in 20 as t, it ends up as 20=0, which is not true.

I don't understand how I am right
 
t(seconds) cannot equal 0 or else the time and distance would be also 0

Why not? t=0 is just the point of firing - one of two points described by the parabola where the height is zero. What other value of t allows the equation:

-16t^2 + 320t = 0

to equal zero? This:

20=-16(20^2) + 320(20)

Is wrong. Why have you placed 20 on the left hand side?
 
Right... lol Thanks!~!~
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top