Quadratic Forms: Closed Form from Values on Basis?

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, Everyone:

I have a quadratic form q, defined on Z<sup>4</sup> , and I know the value of

q on each of the four basis vectors ( I know q is not linear, and there is a sort

of "correction" for non-bilinearity between basis elements , whose values --on

all pairs (a,b) of basis elements-- I do know ).

Question: Is there a way of giving a closed form for q (preferably as a matrix)

that would allow me to compute the value at any 4-ple of Z<sup>4</sup>?

Thanks for any Suggestions, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The matrix of a quadratic form is given by ##q(v)=v^\tau Qv##. Treat ##Q## as variables and you get all necessary equations from the value of ##q## on the basis vectors.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top