Quadratic Function Q&A: Working w/ Numbers Below 10

hell18
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
2 questions

1.can a quadratic function be just set to 1 number e.g. 5 or can it be a bigger number. at the moment I am working on numbers below 10 to get used to the formulas.

2. is this correct how i am doing it?

formula

N --> N2--> 3N2 + 4

e.g.

N =5

5 x 5 = 25 = N2

5 x 25 = 75 = 3N2

N = 79 answer

is that correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your questions are awkwardly written but I think what you want is:

given y= ax2+ bx+ c, you can choose x to be any number you want, then calculate y.

In particular, if y= 3N2+ 4, you would, just as you say, first, find N2, then multiply by 3, then add 4.
 
thats it, yea I am still practicing the equations. i thought Y2 were that if you had Y = 5 then Y2. Then to find Y2 we multiply the 5 by in this case Y2 to get 25 as Y2 would be 25 then mutliply 3N2 by the 25 to get 75 + 4 to get 79

is that ok?:smile:
 
I'm assuming that English is not your native language so I won't be quite as harsh as I could be!

that's it, yea I am still practicing the equations. i thought Y2 were that if you had Y = 5 then Y2. Then to find Y2 we multiply the 5 by in this case Y2 to get 25 as Y2 would be 25 then mutliply 3N2 by the 25 to get 75 + 4 to get 79

Much of this makes no since at all: "i thought Y2 were that if you had Y = 5 then Y2." Then what?? I assume you meant to write "then Y2= 52".

But you also write "Then to find Y2 we multiply the 5 by in this case Y2". No, you multiply 5 by itself- that's what "2" means.

"then mutliply 3N2 by the 25". No, "N2" is 25. You only multiply the 3 by 25. By the way, it's a really, really bad idea to suddenly switch from "Y" to "N".

To calculate 3N2+ 4, for N= 5, you replace the N by 5:
3(5)2+ 4= 3(25)+ 4= 75+ 4= 79.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top