MHB Proof of Quadratic Reciprocity: Undergrad Friendly

  • Thread starter Thread starter matqkks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding an elementary proof of the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity suitable for first or second-year undergraduates studying number theory. One participant suggests a proof involving counting lattice points within a square, referencing a theorem related to the Legendre symbol. They emphasize that while the proof may seem standard, it is crucial for understanding the concept of quadratic reciprocity. The conversation highlights the importance of visualizing lattice points to derive the reciprocity law effectively. Overall, the thread serves as a resource for students seeking accessible mathematical proofs.
matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
Does anyone know of an elementary proof of the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity. I am looking for a proof that 1st or 2nd year undergraduate can understand. Searching for a proof which is digestible for a student who is doing a first course in number theory.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sure. The proof I know of is by counting lattice points of a square. I thought it was pretty standard, but giving it here in case anyone who reads does not know :

Theorem : $$\left(\frac{a}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\sum_{j = 1}^{(p-1)/2} \left \lfloor \frac{a \cdot j}{p} \right \rfloor}$$

There is a pretty standard proof of this and can be found in any introductory NT text, so I am omitting this here; but do not think that this result is trivial! It's actually the key to the proof of QR.

Now, consider this

View attachment 2160

There are exactly $\left \lfloor \frac{q \cdot j_1}{p} \right \rfloor$ and $\left \lfloor \frac{p\cdot j_2}{q} \right \rfloor$ integer points on the boldfaced straightlines, respectively. And there are $(p-1)/2$ and $(q-1)/2$ integer points on the x and y-axis respectively, so let $j_1$ and $j_2$ run through those. Hence the number of lattice points are

$$\sum_{j_1 = 1}^{(p-1)/2} \left \lfloor \frac{q \cdot j_1}{p} \right \rfloor + \sum_{j_2 = 1}^{(q-1)/2} \left \lfloor \frac{p \cdot j_2}{q} \right \rfloor$$

But then simply counting the lattices gives $(p-1)/2\cdot (q-1)/2$ lattice points in the square. Hence exponentiating both sides to $-1$ gives

$$\left(\frac{p}{q}\right) \left(\frac{q}{p}\right) = (-1)^{(p-1)/2\cdot (q-1)/2}$$
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    2.9 KB · Views: 124
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top