MHB Can Plugging in (x/2) or (x - 1/2) Determine Real Zeros in a Quadratic Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
Plugging in (x/2) or (x - 1/2) into the function f(x) = x - x^2 can help analyze the real zeros of the quadratic equation. The function y = x - x^2 - 1/2 does not intersect the x-axis, indicating that it has no real zeros. The concavity of f(x) suggests that lowering the graph will not change its ability to cross the x-axis. Evaluating the discriminant, D = b^2 - 4ac, for each quadratic form reveals insights into the nature of the zeros. Understanding these shifts and their effects on the graph is crucial for determining the presence of real zeros.
mathland
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I can replace f(x) with x - x^2. Should I plug (x/2) into f(x)? How about (x - 1/2) into f(x)? I need the set up.

FB_IMG_1612321220546.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note the range of $f(x)$. A and B are vertical shifts, C and D are horizontal shifts. Which one of the given shifts would result in the graph of $f(x)$ not crossing the $x-\text{axis}$?
 
Greg said:
Note the range of $f(x)$. A and B are vertical shifts, C and D are horizontal shifts. Which one of the given shifts would result in the graph of $f(x)$ not crossing the $x-\text{axis}$?

Let y = the function.

y = x - x^2 - 1/2 does not cross the line y = 0.
 
Note the concavity of $f(x)$. What does that tell you about lowering the graph of $f(x)$? (the line $y=0$ does not concern us presently).
 
write each quadratic in standard form, $ax^2+bx+c$ ... check each discriminant, $D = b^2-4ac$

you know what the discriminant can tell you about the nature of zeros, right?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top