Admissions Quality of undergrad institution affect grad admissions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of undergraduate institution prestige on graduate program admissions in physics. Participants express varying opinions, with some asserting that the reputation of the undergraduate school has little to no effect on acceptance chances, while others believe it plays a vital role. A key point is that strong academic performance, such as a high GPA and excellent GRE scores, combined with research experience, can make a candidate competitive regardless of their school's prestige. However, it is noted that graduates from well-known institutions may receive preferential treatment during admissions. The consensus leans towards the idea that the quality of the undergraduate program and faculty is more significant than the institution's name, emphasizing that graduate programs prioritize candidates' potential for research and their preparedness for advanced academic work. Ultimately, while prestige can open doors, individual achievements and the quality of the educational experience are crucial for success in graduate admissions.
manlyman62
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello! I was just wondering if the perceived quality or ranking of an undergrad institution has a significant imapct on the chances of getting accepted to a given graduate program in physics. There have been people who have said things ranging from "little to no impact" to "vital", so I'm confused as to how important it really is.
Example: Student A gets a stellar GPA (3.8-4.0), excellent GRE scores (both general and physics subject test), has researched every summer, and maybe even has a paper published. If this student went to Bodunk College rather than Ivy U., would this person be able to get into a good grad program?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course. While the quality of your undergrad has some indirect effect on grad school admissions, someone who worked hard, had a good GPA/scores, and did research at any school would be competitive. The only difference seems to be that there are more opportunities and better classes available to those who go to undergrads with strong science departments.
 
manlyman62 said:
Example: Student A gets a stellar GPA (3.8-4.0), excellent GRE scores (both general and physics subject test), has researched every summer, and maybe even has a paper published. If this student went to Bodunk College rather than Ivy U., would this person be able to get into a good grad program?

I don't think that the name of the undergraduate school matters, but some undergraduate schools end up with better names simply because they have better programs. One other thing is that "name brand" tends to matter less for graduate programs than undergraduate ones. There are some very, very good graduate programs in schools that aren't well known.
 
Hmm, I just stumbled upon an interesting comment from the Study Hacks blog, saying:

"... A friend of mine who had interviewed people for the admissions committee in our department said that there was a list of 20 or so prestigious schools, and students from these lists received extra admission “points”. Those from non-prestigious schools had to be really, really good or had to have done something extra-special to get in. ..."

http://calnewport.com/blog/2007/09/...s-matter-where-you-went-to-college/#comments"

What's everyone's take on this? On the one hand, it does somewhat support the notion that you can get in regardless of where you went to college, but on the other it adds to fuel the fears of many who don't attend a "prestigious" university.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think this is a lost cause. It doesn't matter what people who have actually been involved in admitting people into grad school think, because there's always some blogger who knows a guy who knows a guy and his advice is taken much more seriously.
 
Manlyman - twofish-quant's advice is what you should follow - if the program is better, then your coursework, letters of recommendation, etc carry more weight. It's that simple. Grad admissions is not like undergrad admissions - they want to see that you have potential to be a researcher for several years, and have a chance at doing a good job. Undergrad is something a ton of people apply for, and a lot of people would attend a top undergrad school and get something out of it. Notice that this gives schools a lot of freedom, because they can admit a variety of different people.

In grad admissions, if you're better prepared for the hardcore intellectual work, and someone with credibility says so, then you're in. Otherwise, you're out. Granted, there is still the issue of discrepancy between showing you're capable and being capable.

Overall undergraduate prestige hardly matters, it's the quality of the department and faculty (along with your taking advantage) which matter. Minute differences in department styles doesn't matter, but huge differences in quality of education awarded do.

If you come from a lesser known school, you can make a top notch program if you compensate - you would need to excel in standardized testing and/or do high quality research. Your classes will be taken to mean less if they mean less. It's pretty straightforward really.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
108
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top