Quantifying explosions - how to determine force/pressure/etc?

  • Thread starter Thread starter denver75
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explosions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on quantifying the forces and energy involved in explosive demonstrations, specifically using PETN as the primary explosive. The main challenge is determining how to measure the energy expended during an explosion, as the rate of detonation does not correlate directly with the explosion's magnitude when more material is used. A suggested formula for estimating the explosion's radius over time is R = (E t^2/ρ)^(1/5), where R is the explosion radius, E is the energy released, and ρ is the ambient air density. This formula has historical relevance, being used to estimate energy in the Trinity test. The conversation seeks additional information, statistics, or formulas to further understand the dynamics of explosive forces.
denver75
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
We're doing another demonstration about explosives, discussing the forces created.

Our primary explosive is PETN (detcord) - handled by a licensed technician of course.

I need to prepare some facts about the physical forces at play with the explosions. How can I quantify the energy expended? I've been digging around and the only statistic that is readily available is the rate of detonation. However, as more explosive material is used, the rate of detonation doesn't increase, but the explosion does.

Any info/facts/stats/formulas that might get me on the right path?
Thanks!
-D75
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have any expertise in this area, but I do recall that the equation:

R = (\frac{E t^2}{\rho}})^{\frac{1}{5}}

where R is the radius of the explosion at time t, E is the released in the explosion, and \rho is the ambient density of air in the vicinity, was correctly used by a physicist who wasn't working on the Manhattan project to determine the energy released in the trinity test based on measurements of R vs t, although the value for the total energy was classified for decades, this method yields the answer within 10%. By the way, the formula should also apply for light explosives too.

I will wait for others to say more, since I don't know much about explosives.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top