Quantization of EM in UV & vacuum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights that the UV catastrophe did not occur due to the quantization of electromagnetic (EM) modes, which prevents higher frequency modes from contributing significantly. In vacuum, calculations suggest that the contribution of EM modes is 120 magnitudes greater than what is observed, leading to speculation about a cancellation effect. The conversation questions why the quantization of EM modes wasn't proposed to explain this discrepancy, similar to the UV catastrophe. It also notes that while quantum field theory allows for assigning energy density to the vacuum, its relevance to our universe remains uncertain. Ultimately, the role of quantization is emphasized as essential to understanding these phenomena.
Edward Wij
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
UV catastrophe didn't occur because em are quantized.. so the higher frequency modes were not there. In vacuum.. if you compute the contribution of the em modes, it is 120 magnitude greater than observed.. the mystery is why it is not and they theorize it is just canceled out. But why didn't they just propose the em is quantized and so the contribution of the em modes didn't occur in the vacuum just like in the UV catastrophe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edward Wij said:
if you compute the contribution of the em modes, it is 120 magnitude greater than observed.
It is not.
Based on quantum field theory, there is a possible way to assign something like an energy density to the vacuum in a way that leads to a huge value. There is no special reason to assume that value has any relevance for our world, however. The only way it could influence our world (if at all) is via general relativity, and the unification of this with quantum field theory is an open problem on its own.
All this does not happen at all without quantization, so asking why it is not quantized does not make sense.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top