Quantization of Gauge theories ?

mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
Quantization of Gauge theories ??

Hi , i am trying to learn the math formalism of Gauge Theories

as far as i know they begin with the 1-form

A= \sum_{i} T^{i}A_{\mu}^{i}

where 'T_i ' are the generators of the Lie Group

then we define the 2-form F= dA + (1/2)[A,A]

and the equation of motion are dF =0 (exterior derivative of F ) and *d *F = J

with J being an external source and *F_{ij}=e_{ijkl}F^{kl} Hodge Star operator

QUESTION:
=========

How can you define a Hamiltonian of Your Gauge theory if the Lagrangian is equal to tr[F^{ab}F_{ab}]

how can you apply the Quantization to these theories ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


mhill said:
How can you define a Hamiltonian of Your Gauge theory if the Lagrangian is equal to tr[F^{ab}F_{ab}]

how can you apply the Quantization to these theories ??
Two ways: one is the sum over histories approach which requires knowledge only of the Lagrangian.

The other is to treat the potential A as the "position" coordinate, so we can find the canonically conjugate momenta

\pi = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{A}}

and then use the Legendre transform to get the Hamiltonian

H = \pi\partial_{0}A - L.

NOTE NOTE NOTE these are Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, and momentum DENSITIES and if you want to get the Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, or momentum you merely integrate the corresponding density over the spatial volume.

Usually you end up with constraints in the canonical approach and you either quantize then constrain (Dirac's approach) or constrain then quantize (reduced phase space approach). It's a whole problem...

A good book or two to refer to would be Quantization of Fields with Constraints by D. M. Gitman and I.V. Tyutin (the latter was the "T" in the BRST technique of gauge quantization), or Quantization of Gauge Systems by Henneaux and Teitelboim. The latter is a more difficult read (my notes consist of elucidating what they say, and providing more detailed proofs; it's very elegant but also very short and kinda choppy in the beginning in my opinion...).
 


Look at chapter 15 in Weinberg or Dirac's little primer "Lectures in quantum mechanics".
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top