Quantization of Orbits: Explained

aymer
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hi there

we know that electrons around the nucleus in an atom can only exist in certain discrete energy levels (orbits) and that they can jump from one energy state to a higher one or a lower one. where is the electron when it is jumping from a higher stste to a lower state if it cannot exist anywhere in between? :confused:

thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These states are not states in space and time, they are discrete states in energy space.

When going from the e.g. ground state to the 1st excited state, we describe this transition by a pertrurbation, i.e the state the electron is in will be a linear combination of these two states.

The thing must understand is quantum formalism (of the Copenhagen interpretation). One of these steps is that it is meaningless to ask in what state the electron was prior to measurement. Also, superposition of states etc are crucial to understand, you have not specified what your current status in quantum physics learning you are at. Have you just finished your first class at collage in quantum mechanics or are you just curious?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top