Quantized Kinetic Energy of Relativistic Objects

jrvinayak
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I want to know if energy added to moving objects is quantized. Kinetic energy of an moving object is given as KE = (γ - 1) mc2 , where γ is 1/√(1-v2/c2).

And quantum theory talks about any energy always being quantized. So can the KE in moving objects be quantized?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jrvinayak, welcome to PF!
jrvinayak said:
And quantum theory talks about any energy always being quantized.
This is a very common misconception. Even in quantum mechanics there are some systems where energy is quantized and other systems where the energy is not quantized. One very interesting and simple system is the so-called finite potential well

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_potential_well

This system includes both bound states which are quantized and free states which are not quantized.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
I agree with DaleSpam's response. I'd just add that less formally, the "potential well" problem is known as a "particle in a box". You might google for this term. The particle in a box has quantized momentum and energy, but the details depends on the size of the box. Formally, we'd describe this dependence by saying "it depends on the boundary conditions". The free particle that's not confined to a box doesn't have quantized momentum or energy levels. The best forum to ask for further details would be the quantum mechanics forum, it's not really within the scope of GR.
 
Be, however, warned that "particle in a box" often means the only apparently simpler problem of an infinitely high potential well. However, this is a particularly difficult case, if done mathematically correctly, because for this problem no proper momentum observable exists anymore, but that's a topic belonging more to the quantum-theory forum. The finite-potential well is only a bit more work but has the advantage of having a well-defined realization of the Heisenberg algebra in terms of the wave-mechanics formulation.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top