I Quantum Causal Modelling: Mathematics

WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
14
I have been trying to read through the following paper: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/18/6/063032/pdf, but am stuck at the parts from page 6 onwards.

What is the "approach/formalism" used in the following sections of the paper, and are there any gentle introductions (available online, preferably) to this topic I can read through that may help me understand what's in the paper? I have seen similar mathematics appear in quite a few QM papers now and can't help but wonder if it's important.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps I should have been more specific in my question, apologies:

Could anyone recommend some introductory materials to
1. "Process Matrix Formalism" - as mentioned in the abstract
2. Completely Positive Trace Preserving maps, Choi–Jamiołkowski isomorphism, and how they are used in QM

Thanks in advance.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top