I Quantum Causal Modelling: Mathematics

WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
14
I have been trying to read through the following paper: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/18/6/063032/pdf, but am stuck at the parts from page 6 onwards.

What is the "approach/formalism" used in the following sections of the paper, and are there any gentle introductions (available online, preferably) to this topic I can read through that may help me understand what's in the paper? I have seen similar mathematics appear in quite a few QM papers now and can't help but wonder if it's important.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps I should have been more specific in my question, apologies:

Could anyone recommend some introductory materials to
1. "Process Matrix Formalism" - as mentioned in the abstract
2. Completely Positive Trace Preserving maps, Choi–Jamiołkowski isomorphism, and how they are used in QM

Thanks in advance.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top