Quantum computation vs classic computation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the approach to writing an undergraduate thesis on quantum computation without a background in physics. It highlights the suggestion by Andris Ambainis that one can learn quantum mechanics through the lens of quantum computing. Participants recommend starting with the book "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" by Nielsen and Chuang, which is accessible for beginners and covers essential concepts, though it may be outdated regarding experimental advancements. The conversation emphasizes the importance of determining whether the focus is on hardware or software aspects of quantum computing. For those interested primarily in software, a deep understanding of quantum mechanics may not be necessary, while a basic grasp of quantum mechanics is beneficial for hardware-related topics. Resources like YouTube and Wikipedia are also suggested for foundational knowledge.
cyborgfuture
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Next semester I am going to write a undergrad thesis about quantum computation, but my background is not from physics but from mathematics and computer engineering. In this talk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvn_3cCrl9c Andris Ambainis talks about how he got into the field of quantum computing and suggest that one can learn quantum mechanics by first learning about quantum computers. Is this a good idea?

My problem is this. I want to write about quantum computation (from a abstract computational view), but I don't know any quantum physics. Shall I start by learning the basics of quantum physics or go straight to quantum computation theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would suggest Quantum Computation and Quantum Information by Nielsen and Chuang. It assumes no prior knowledge in Quantum Mechanics. If you have some experience in Linear Algebra, then it would be a bonus.Welcome to Physics Forums.
 
Last edited:
The book suggested above is very good. It has a lot of material for the beginner and they describe the basics very thouroughly. Just be aware that the chapter on the physical realization of quantum computers is somewhat outdated by now as the book is more than 10 years old and the experimental field has moved forward a lot since then. For the rest though, the book is a very good starting place.
 
I would ask myself, hardware or software? If you are only interested in the software side, focus on the quantum logic (I'd ignorantly say it's like fuzzy logic). I don't think actual quantum mechanics is important. However if you do have an interest in the hardware side, some basic quantum mechanics on the experimental side (which is easier) would do. I am not a quantum computer expert. I am just a quantum physicist. Theoretical quantum physics can be tricky with the bra ket notation and all the other conventions. So just avoid that. I would just use youtube and Wikipedia for a basic overview. It's silly, but that helped me so much. Good luck and please post a link when you are done writing!
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top