I Quantum decoherence vs. measurement process

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter timmdeeg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Decoherence time is very short for macroscopic objects like detectors, but it does not explain why quantum measurements yield single outcomes. Instead, decoherence accounts for the lack of interference between potential outcomes. The influence of a measurement on the detection system is crucial; for instance, a detector that captures a photon without disturbing its spin does not induce decoherence in that spin. Once a measurement is made and recorded, the state becomes committed and can be viewed as decohered. Understanding the relationship between decoherence and measurement outcomes remains a complex topic in quantum mechanics.
timmdeeg
Gold Member
Messages
1,545
Reaction score
342
The decoherence time is extremely short for macroscopic objects like a detector. Does this mean that the outcome of a quantum measurement which happens instantaneous can be understood as being caused by decoherence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
timmdeeg said:
The decoherence time is extremely short for macroscopic objects like a detector. Does this mean that the outcome of a quantum measurement which happens instantaneous can be understood as being caused by decoherence?
No, because decoherence does not explain why measurements have single outcomes. It only explains why there is no interference between different outcomes.
 
timmdeeg said:
The decoherence time is extremely short for macroscopic objects like a detector. Does this mean that the outcome of a quantum measurement which happens instantaneous can be understood as being caused by decoherence?
The detector may be large, but what is important is how much influence a measurement has on the state of the detection system. A detector that captures a photon or other particle without disturbing its spin would not result in decoherence of the spin. Once a measurement has resulted in the movement of a dial or the recording or transmission of measurement data, that measured state is committed - it can be "understood" as decohered.
 
Thanks to both of you for clarifying my question.
 

Thread 'The Power of QM and QFT'

We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Comparing Information Loss: Time Dilation vs. Decoherence
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Does gravity cause quantum decoherence?
Replies
20
Views
3K
B Does decoherence prevent 100% of quantum tunneling of macro object?
Replies
4
Views
1K
A Multi-scale Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Do entanglement networks encode a unique, local historical record?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I If we wait infinitely long, will macroscopic objects undergo quantum tunneling?
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
I Quantum decoherence and the emergence of space/time and gravity
Replies
17
Views
2K
I Is quantum mechanics imply nature is deterministic or probabilistic?
Replies
8
Views
3K
I Electrons keeping dynamical quantum fluctuations?
Replies
0
Views
1K
A Decoherence in the Heisenberg Picture
Replies
1
Views
1K