Quantum Efficiency Mapping setup for solar cell charatcerization

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the setup for a quantum efficiency (QE) measurement system for solar cell characterization. Participants explore the requirements for collimated light, the use of monochromatic light versus laser light, and the potential effects of various factors on measurement accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether collimated light is necessary for QE characterization and expresses concerns about the implications of using a Gaussian beam.
  • Another participant suggests that a reasonably collimated beam is required, noting that reflectivity of silicon varies with the angle of incidence.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the use of monochromatic light instead of laser light for QE mapping, with one participant questioning the power output of a monochromator used with a white-light source.
  • A participant highlights that quantum efficiency varies with frequency and may be poor in the infrared and ultraviolet regions, emphasizing the importance of measuring output current for solar cells.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential interference of dark current in QE measurements and the need for calibration methods for the light source.
  • Details about the planned measurement system include the use of a Class-B light source and a solar cell size of approximately 3x3 cm², with setup expected in 1-2 months.
  • One participant clarifies that they meant a focused beam rather than a Gaussian beam, noting that non-uniform intensity could affect measurements for larger area cells.
  • There are concerns about the complexity and cost associated with adding a laser beam to the measurement system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of collimated light and the implications of using monochromatic versus laser light. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for QE measurement and the impact of various factors on the accuracy of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about light intensity, wavelength stability, and the effects of series resistance on photo-current, but these aspects remain unresolved and are dependent on specific experimental conditions.

2lai
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In order to build a QE measurement system, I want to confirm the following issues: (1) Is collimated light required for QE characterization of the entire solar cell? How "bad" it could be if having Gaussian beam? (2) It seems LBIC is most common for QE mapping. Is it possible to use monochromatic light instead of laser for QE mapping? I guess the restrictions may include (a) light intensity; (b) wavelength drifting of monochromator in the long mapping duration (Yes or No?) (c) the series resistance of the grid may affect photo-current since photo-generated carriers at different location will travel different distance prior to collection (is this effect negligible?)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, I'll answer what I can.

(1)
Yes, you'd want a reasonably collimated beam, since the reflectivity of silicon will vary with angle of incidence. Collimated to within a few milliradians should definitely work, and probably within 5 degrees would work too.

Not sure why you think a Gaussian beam would be bad ... as long as it's reasonably collimated, it shouldn't matter if it's Gaussian or not.

(2)
Not sure what you mean, since a laser beam is monochromatic. Or do you mean you want to vary the wavelength? I'm not sure how much power you can get by using a monochromator as a filter on a white-light source.
 
Do you want to do this with sunlight, or with monochromatic light? The quantum efficiency varies with frequency, and is probably very poor in both the infra red and ultra violet regions. For "clean systems" like photomultipliers, QE measurement is relatively easy. For solar cells, measuring the output current is the only way to get QE, and dark current may interfere. What method do you plan to use for calibrating your light source, and how accurate a measurement do you need? How big a solar cell do you plan to use it on, and how fast do do want to do it (i.e., production line application)?
 
We plan to order a Class-B light source. The cell size is around 3x3 cm^2. The measurement system will be setup in 1-2 months.
 
Thanks Redbelly98.
(1) I should say focused beam rather than Gaussian beam. The intensity is not uniform (not collimated either) which may affect the measurement especially for large area cell.
(2) Adding a laser beam in the measurement system also add the complexity and $$$. It is also my concern the output power of monochromatic light.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K