Quantum Inflation of Classical Shapes by Tim Koslowski

  • Thread starter Thread starter twistor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inflation Quantum
twistor
Messages
74
Reaction score
8
Hello community! I found this paper and I wanted to share it with you and know what are your thoughts about it.
The author is one of the main proponents of Shape Dynamics.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.4815.pdf

Quantum Inflation of Classical Shapes
Tim Koslowski
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of New Brunswick
Fredericton, NB, Canada
t.a.koslowski@gmail.com
April 21, 2014
Abstract
I consider a quantum system that possesses key features of quantum shape dynamics and show that the evolution of wave-packets will be come increasingly classical at late times and tend to evolve more and more like
an expanding classical system. At early times however, semiclassical effects become large and lead to an exponential mismatch of the apparent scale as compared to the expected classical evolution of the scale degree
of freedom. This quantum inflation of an emergent and effectively classical system, occurs naturally in the quantum shape dynamics description of the system, while it is unclear whether and how it might arise in a
constrained Hamiltonian quantization.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top