Quantum mechanics for wave equation solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the differential equation d²ψ(x)/dx² = k²ψ(x) to determine the values of 'a' for which e^(a*x) is a valid solution. Participants suggest substituting ψ(x) = e^(a*x) into the equation and taking its second derivative to find 'a'. The importance of verifying proposed solutions by checking if they satisfy the equation is emphasized, with an example illustrating an invalid solution. Ultimately, the thread concludes with the original poster successfully resolving the problem with community assistance. This highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in quantum mechanics discussions.
bfed
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

consider the differential d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x); for which values of a is the equation e^(a*x) is a solution to the above equation.

2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution
I have been working on this problem but I do not know how relate the 2 equations, or if I should use the Schrodinger equation. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi bfed ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
bfed said:
consider the differential d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x); for which values of a is the equation e^(a*x) is a solution to the above equation..

Just put ψ(x) = eax into d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x), and solve for a. :wink:
 
thanks tiny-tim,
so i should take the second derivative of ψ(x) = eax before I substitute it into d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x) and solve for a?
 
bfed said:
thanks tiny-tim,
so i should take the second derivative of ψ(x) = eax before I substitute it into d²ψ(x)/dx²=k²ψ(x) and solve for a?

uhhh? :confused:

just put it in! :smile:
 
I think your confusion may come from from the idea of solutions to differential equations.
A solution is anything that we can put into this equation where after taking the derivatives and everything, the two sides equal each other. i.e. we are testing to see if our proposed solution of \Psi(x) is valid. A good example to show would be one where the proposed solution was not valid. let's consider the proposed solution:

\Psi(x) = x^2

Now if we plug this into our differential equation we obtain:


2 = k^2 x^2

If k is a constant this is obviously not always true(example x=0). Therefore our proposed solution is not valid. In reality we want to find solutions that are valid. Let's propose a solution:


\Psi(x) = e^{ax}

Now you go as I did in the invalid case, and plug \Psi(x) into our differential equation. You will find that 'a' must equal something for the solution to be valid.
 
thanks all, got'er done with your help!
-bfed
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top