Quantum Mechanics: Fundamental Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Domnu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental
Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm extremely new to quantum mechanics (my only knowledge of quantum mechanics is that taught in physics C, ergo none, and a bit of wave mechanics... however I have a pretty strong mathematics background... diff-eqs + linear alg. + vector calc.), and was wondering as to how the derivation of

<br /> <br /> \[<br /> E = \hbar \omega \iff p = \hbar k<br /> \]<br /> <br />

worked. Here's my derivation, which seems encouraging, but could someone tell me where my derivation messed up?

<br /> <br /> \[<br /> E = \hbar \omega \iff \frac{1}{2} pv = \hbar \cdot 2 \pi f \iff <br /> \frac{1}{2} p= \hbar \cdot \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \iff p = 2 \hbar k \neq \hbar k<br /> \]<br /> <br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem lies in the difference between phase velocity and group velocity. And neither of these equations are really derived, although they are "consistent". de Broglie did it from analogies between classical mechanics and Fermat's ideas about light.
 
Domnu said:
<br /> <br /> \[<br /> E = \hbar \omega \iff \frac{1}{2} pv = \hbar \cdot 2 \pi f \iff <br /> \frac{1}{2} p= \hbar \cdot \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \iff p = 2 \hbar k \neq \hbar k<br /> \]<br /> <br />

You should use the relativistic expression for energy. For example, to verify the relation for a photon, use

E = pc.

This can be derived from electromagnetic theory, or from the relation

E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4

by setting m = 0. If we put this in E = \hbar \omega, we get

pc = \hbar \omega = \hbar 2\pi f.

Since f\lambda = c, we get

p = \hbar \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} = \hbar k.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top