Quantum Mechanics Positional Operator

UbikPkd
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
\Psi_{n}(x) = \sqrt{2/L}sin(\pinx/L), 0 \leqx \leq L


\Psi_{n}(x) = 0, x<0, x>L

\pi is meant to be just normal, not superscript, sorry

n is an integer

show that <\hat{x}> = L/2




<\hat{x}> is the expectation value of the positional operator \hat{x} right?


\hat{x} \Psi= x \Psi i think so...







\int2x/L sin ^{2}(\pi2nx/L) dx

which gets me L/2 - L^{2}/4n^{2} \pi^{2}


but it is supposed to be just L/2 sigh...

any help will be much appreciated :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UbikPkd said:
\Psi_{n}(x) = \sqrt{2/L}sin(\pinx/L), 0 \leqx \leq L


\Psi_{n}(x) = 0, x<0, x>L

\pi is meant to be just normal, not superscript, sorry

n is an integer

show that <\hat{x}> = L/2




<\hat{x}> is the expectation value of the positional operator \hat{x} right?


\hat{x} \Psi= x \Psi i think so...







\int2x/L sin ^{2}(\pi2nx/L) dx

Hint: Put everything inside a single tex quote! As in

\int_0^L ~\frac{2x}{L}~ \sin^{2}(\pi 2 n x / L) dx

This seems right (you used the limits to be 0 and L, right?)
Can you show your steps? You must have made a mistake in the integration.
 
ok here goes, i was wary of doing that because, as you can see, that was my first post and it took forever!

sorry that last one should have read:

\int_0^L ~\frac{2x}{L}~ \sin^{2}(\pi n x / L) dx \int_0^L ~\frac{x}{L}~- ~\frac{x}{L}~ \cos(2 \pi n x / L) dx

integrating by parts:

~\frac{x^{2}}{2L}-(~\frac{x}{L}~~\frac{L}{2n \pi }~\sin(~\frac{2 n \pi x}{L}~)- \int_0^L ~\frac{L}{2 n \pi L}~\sin~\frac{2n \pi x}{L}~dx )\left[ ~\frac{x^{2}}{2L}-~\frac{x}{2n \pi}~\sin(~\frac{2 n \pi x}{L}~)- ~\frac{L}{4 n^{2} \pi^{2}}~\cos~\frac{2n \pi x}{L}~ \right] (between L and 0)

= ~\frac{L}{2}~ - ~\frac{L}{4 n^{2} \pi^{2}}~

but it should just be ~\frac{L}{2}~ ?
 
Last edited:
you have basically worked out the answer, it's just that you forgot that the when zero is put in as a limit in the second part (the cosine part), it gives 1 aswell. i.e. cos(2 \pi n) = cos(0), so the second part that you got disappears, leaving you with just the L/2 which is what you want.

&lt;x&gt; = ~\frac{L}{2}~ - ~\frac{L}{(2 \pi n)^2}~ + ~\frac{L}{(2 \pi n)^2}~
 
Last edited:
ppyadof said:
you have basically worked out the answer, it's just that you forgot that the when zero is put in as a limit in the second part (the cosine part), it gives 1 aswell. i.e. cos(2 \pi n) = cos(0), so the second part that you got disappears, leaving you with just the L/2 which is what you want.

&lt;x&gt; = ~\frac{L}{2}~ - ~\frac{L}{(2 \pi n)^2}~ + ~\frac{L}{(2 \pi n)^2}~

AHHHHHH I've done that so many times, still i haven't learnt, thank you very much, both of you!

nrqed
i read your blog, a few days ago id never done any quantum, they threw us in by asking for the wave function of the 'particle in a box' . It was a steep learning curve that lasted all night and several litres of coffee...got there in the end!
 
UbikPkd said:
AHHHHHH I've done that so many times, still i haven't learnt, thank you very much, both of you!

nrqed
i read your blog, a few days ago id never done any quantum, they threw us in by asking for the wave function of the 'particle in a box' . It was a steep learning curve that lasted all night and several litres of coffee...got there in the end!

That's ok. Only too glad to help. Steep learning curves are the best in the long run, take my word for it :P
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top